Nothing like a home Olympics
The news that London had beaten off the likes of Spain and Paris to might have led some British sportsmen and women to believe that the build-up to a Games on home soil would have plenty of positives.
Access to your own facilities, going home to your own bed at night, perhaps training at a one of the many Olympic venues - these are all the benefits that should come with hosting the biggest sporting event there is.
But the reality is far different. A sizeable number of British competitors at London 2012 will have spent the years leading up to the Games honing their skills and eking out a living in almost any nation except their own.
Take as an example. Seven years ago, the British women's water polo team comprised four players and a coach. But then everything changed in order to produce a competitive team for London 2012.
"Now we've got more full-time training and pool time when we need it, plus gym coaches and sport science," says centre-back . "It's amazing how much has changed."
But what the British women's team do not have is any decent opposition in this country. There are so few world-class water polo players here that the only way the national side is ever going to improve is if they head abroad.
The whole squad are now set to compete - as Great Britain - in the , which begins in October. Every fortnight, the team will hop on a no-frills flight to Budapest, play two games, then come back. And they will do this for half a year.
"Over there, water polo is like football here," says GB captain . "The men's game is on telly every weekend and I think some of the women's will be as well.
Ìý
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash Installed. Visit ´óÏó´«Ã½ Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
"Obviously the ideal would be that we don't have to go abroad any more, that we're strong enough to have good-quality national leagues ourselves. That is happening slowly but, for now, we've definitely got to go abroad for the level we need."
Athletes getting on planes and travelling for their sport is not much of a headline, but there is a world of difference between Usain Bolt heading to his latest Diamond League meeting (or not, ) and struggling water polo players uprooting their lives for a sport few people in Britain have heard of let, alone watched.
You see, the British women's team actually don't have it so bad with their twice-monthly expeditions east. Their male counterparts, plus Britain's top handball and volleyball players, have been compelled to strike out alone, signing professional contracts with top European club sides to get the experience they need.
"I'm now writing from Terrassa, in Spain," wrote GB water polo's Scott Carpenter on ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport's 606 last week. "I have signed to play in the Spanish Premier Division. It's a great opportunity as the Spanish league is one of the most prestigious and no British players have had the chance to play here before.
"Luckily [GB team-mate] Rob Parker and I have been offered places at the same club, so it's good to have a team-mate who speaks English and we can help each other get to grips with the culture and language.
"I'm way out of my depth with my GCSE Spanish but I'm doing my best to learn some each day. There is also a bit of curiosity about the new British players. My first pre-season session was in the gym with a television cameraman stood a metre from my face, while I tried to translate what the coach was saying and concentrate on training."
There are worse ways to earn a living than being paid to play water polo in Spain but reducing it to "nice sport, hot country" masks many of the difficulties Britons abroad face in pursuing their Olympic dream.
For example, I know of a British handball player who signed to play for a European club, only to find the team in financial turmoil when he got there. The coach who signed him had walked out days earlier.
Now, as his season begins, the player believes the contract he is being offered is markedly different from the one he agreed to sign before he left. But his options are limited. He is young and he needs to play at this level to progress as a player. What if kicking up a fuss ends his season, or his career, less than two years out from the Games? It is unthinkable after years of toiling away.
Homesickness and loneliness do not get mentioned much when it comes to challenges facing Olympic hopefuls but they are big concerns here. And whereas sports like hockey have ploughed resources into team-building and are reaping the rewards, that is wishful thinking for handball or volleyball, whose players keep in touch with the occasional session if they're lucky.
Playing and training abroad in these sports is no holiday. It is a long slog. And, after years of doing this, some GB squad members may not even be selected for 2012. But there is a bright side, too, argues Joanna Wray, water polo's world class performance manager.
"Getting the men abroad sets up a pathway for the younger ones coming through - that they can go and play professionally abroad. It's very good for our legacy," says Wray, who also believes the women are making a "massive name" for themselves by going to Hungary.
And pushing the top British talent overseas provides chances for the potential stars of 2016 and 2020 to establish themselves back here in the United Kingdom, too.
Not only that, sports such as volleyball are able to point to the number of British players earning money abroad as evidence of the progress they are making. Four years ago, volleyball had one Briton in that situation. Now, there are 30.
Whether British athletes should have to pack their bags in order to further their Olympic dreams is a big talking point. But when you watch the massed ranks of smiling athletes at the opening ceremony in 2012, remember that some members of the British team are not just happy to be competing at home, they are happy to be home.
Ìý
Comment number 1.
At 5th Oct 2010, Rich_Owl wrote:It's an interesting point, but I'd doubt that "Whether British athletes should have to pack their bags in order to further their Olympic dreams is a big talking point". Its unrealistic to expect that the UK would or even could suddenly fund a high class water polo or handball league just to help the respective national teams in 2012. Your comparison with hockey as unfair as this sport has had a high quality league and we as a nation have a track record in the Olympics in this sport.
I don't intend to demean the efforts these athletes are making to get to the tops of their profession by going abroad with all of the problems that entails. Indeed it is highly commendable that we are developing competitors with the quality to go and play in the best leagues in the world, and that they are willing to make that sacrifice to get to the top. It's just that I question whether it's much of a talking point? In all nations there are some sports which do not have the following or facilities at home and competitors have to go abroad. Many of the top African footballers play in Europe, Scotlands national cricket team plays in the English and Welsh domestic league for one day cricket, US and Carribean athletes spend much of their season in Europe, a couple of Canadian ice Hockey and Baseball teams play in the US league. Not all of these people are doing so to earn millions - they are doing so to improve their sport in another country as their own does not have a high enough quality competition.
Yes in an ideal world each country would have a top quality league/series for each sport but ultimately that is unrealistic. In the end I'm not sure if your article really suggests that these players should be able to develop into world class compatitors at home, or if in the end you are just saying 'look at some of the sacrifices people have made to get here'. If the latter, their sacrificies are real and respected, but they are not unique to the British athletes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 5th Oct 2010, idleIdeas wrote:I don't really see the angle of the article - You use three examples to highlight your point... I'd make the point that 2 out of the 3 are examples of people travelling overseas to further their "Career" not their "olympic dream".
No one is going to make a living in this country playing handball or waterpolo - they are and i mean no offence marginalised sports. There is never going to be Catch of the Day a saturday night round-up of the weekends Handball highlights. Of course after we grab olympic gold this could all change...
I can see no problem whatsoever with someone travelling overseas to carve out a career in a sport that is popular there but not here.... it would frankly be a waste of talent for them not to!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 5th Oct 2010, Ollie Williams wrote:Hi both, thanks for the comments.
Rich_Owl - You're right, of course, top-class water polo can't be magicked out of thin air in Britain.
The comparison with hockey is not intended to suggest that hockey has somehow cracked a problem that water polo and others have not. The point is to illustrate that Britain's various Olympic sports teams (and individuals) operate under very different sets of circumstances. The hockey teams have what is a comparative luxury, in that they can afford to work closely together as a team, whereas some others - in this case the volleyball teams especially - can only dream of that. That's not because hockey has done something right or volleyball has done it wrong, necessarily, it's simply how they have to operate.
Rather than suggesting it's some sort of outrage that Britons can't do everything at home, or simply pointing at them and demanding sympathy, I just feel as though not many people recognise the sorts of existences some Olympic hopefuls carve out. For example, a longer draft of this article included references to handball players cleaning toilets in Denmark overnight to augment the reasonably meagre livelihood they earn through the sport itself. As another example, there are British figure skaters trying to make a low four-figure sum of funding support two people training full-time in eastern Europe. But a lot of that gets masked in the idea that this is a "home Olympics" which, on the face of it, sounds like it should bring some form of home comfort to athletes. In many cases, it doesn't.
IdleIdeas - Yes and no, to the career versus Olympic dream point. Yes, for many athletes their career becomes their Olympic ambition and vice versa. But a number of Britain's top players, in sports like handball, have given up more lucrative careers elsewhere because they want to play their sport at the Games, which is where I think the dream of 2012 outweighs any longer-term ambition. I'd question whether some of those players would be in their sports if they didn't have a London Games to aim at.
There certainly isn't a problem with players going abroad to find sport taking place at the level they need to progress. But it's not something which gains over-much acknowledgement, because these are sports which barely register on a British radar (precisely the reason you have to go abroad to find them being played to a high standard). To my mind, there are aspects of going abroad to pursue sports like these - the determination, the loneliness, the cost (I wish I could go into more detail about the financial messes some athletes find themselves in, for one reason or another) - that are fascinating. Hopefully we'll come back to some of their journeys in the next couple of years.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 6th Oct 2010, JoC wrote:Very interesting article Ollie, it's a real shame so little attention has been focused on the troubles and logistical problems experienced by our so-called 'minority' sports given we're under 2 years away from the games.
How does anyone expect these events to develop better facilities, leagues and encourage new particpants in the future if we're only drip-fed tiny snippets of coverage once every blue moon? Your piece is the first I've seen anywhere about Water Polo.
How realistic are the chances of the men or womens' water polo teams medalling at 2012 given the obstacles you mention and do you think even partial success is essential to the sports long term survival in the UK? Will any success get buried under stories generated by mainstream events?
With so many GB teams being represented in the London games will Water Polo get any more coverage than the 10 mins highlights tucked away late night on ´óÏó´«Ã½2 they normally get? Do these sports need their own Usain Bolt/David Beckham or even Tom Daley to make a splash?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 6th Oct 2010, Ollie Williams wrote:Hi JoC - it's difficult to envisage any of the British water polo teams taking medals at London 2012, based on the way things look on paper. But the great thing about the Olympics is, you never quite know.
That aside, the stated ambition of sports like handball, volleyball and water polo has always been to "be competitive" - by which they mean not embarrassing themselves at London 2012. I think they'll all hit that target (volleyball possibly being the hardest-hit by recent funding changes) but medals would require an enormous helping of luck. As for long-term survival, all sports talk about how they're planning for 2013 and beyond, but in the current financial climate I think much of that is a great unknown. Nobody really knows what sports need to do to "survive" yet, and what survival really means.
As far as coverage goes, the pledge made by the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is to cover all the action, simple as that. Every single moment available to us will be broadcast in some form under current plans. The water polo may not hit ´óÏó´«Ã½ One (it may well do - I don't know) but it ought to be covered in full somewhere on our platforms, at the least.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 7th Oct 2010, JoC wrote:Thanks for the reply Ollie..good know the Beeb will have comprehensive coverage across all platforms - that'll mean a lot of hours of games footage but in the digital age highly possible. Hope it isn't tucked away on i-player though.
No British sportsman or woman should ever feel embarrassed representing their nation as simply being there proves they're the best the country has - no matter what happens? Even Eddie The Eagle Edwards did his best and bought attention to Ski-Jumping by showing true British spirit ;)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)