Track Worlds 2011: Everything you need to know
Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
Which events is Sir Chris Hoy competing in at the Track Cycling World Championships this week? More importantly, which ones is he expected to win?
Who is this Anna Meares character who always gets mentioned alongside Victoria Pendleton? Are Australia suddenly better than Britain at this? Why don't we care about the individual pursuit any more; why isn't Bradley Wiggins anywhere to be seen?
And where's , anyway?
If you're interested in watching the Worlds this week but not a hardened cycling fanatic, here's a quick guide.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions
How important are the World Championships?
It's the pinnacle of the sport this year and winning a medal is incredibly tough. However, countries take different approaches to the Worlds, particularly this close to an Olympic Games.
Australia, for example, have always insisted on throwing the kitchen sink at the World Championships. There are 10 gold medals on offer in Olympic disciplines and nine more in events which won't be part of London 2012, and the Aussies will go for broke at the whole lot.
"The Worlds are the Worlds. We wouldn't ever want to devalue them," Australian coach Gary Sutton . (Sutton is the older brother of British coach Shane.)
"The rainbow jersey still means a huge amount in this sport. We also take the view that we want to develop our athletes for way beyond London 2012. That means getting them out there racing as much as possible, and that includes non-Olympic races like the kilo, points, scratch and madison."
By contrast, British efforts are almost exclusively concentrated on the Olympic disciplines. There is likely to be some GB representation in the non-Olympic events but they're of mild interest to the team at best. What matters for Britain is tuning up for 2012 - if that involves winning a world title then great, but it's all about Olympic gold.
"The World Championships are great and I'm proud of the 10 gold medals I've won in my career," . "I'd love to win another but I'd sacrifice them all for another Olympic title. We are confident that we'll be at our best in London when it really matters."
If this isn't as important as 2012, how strong is the British team at the Worlds?
The British approach does not mean fielding a weakened squad - far from it. has been labelled the "nucleus" of the eventual Olympic line-up by British Cycling, and most of the big names are in.
Bradley Wiggins and Geraint Thomas are important absentees. They in the men's team pursuit at last month's World Cup event in Manchester but are predominantly road cyclists and have returned to that domain for the summer. Lizzie Armitstead would have been in the women's omnium and possibly the team pursuit, but has pulled out with a side strain.
Otherwise, it's difficult to see how the GB team here could be strengthened. Matt Crampton, Ross Edgar and Jason Kenny join Hoy in as strong a sprint squad as Britain could probably field, while youngsters Laura Trott and Dani King are driving on the women's endurance squad, threatening the places of established stars like Wendy Houvenaghel and Joanna Rowsell. Trott, King and teenager Sam Harrison - who may get an outing in the men's omnium or team pursuit - are prospects which make British coaches visibly excited for 2012.
If GB are that strong, why are Australia suddenly top dogs?
Buoyed by funding around their own home Olympics in Sydney in 2000, Australia dominated track cycling in Athens in 2004, .
, they managed just one medal in the entire Olympic tournament and that was won by Meares, coming in behind Pendleton in the women's sprint - an Aussie defeat.
Since then Australia have dominated, easily topping the medal table at the 2009 and 2010 World Championships. There are various reasons for that, among them that Australian affection for the Worlds. British track cyclists, basking in Olympic glory, haven't quite had the same incentive to rip up the record books, knowing their focus is on a home Olympics.
But to say Australia's recent dominance is down to Britain sitting back is unfair on both parties. That shocker of an Olympic performance sparked the Australians into action, at the same time as a superb new generation of talent emerged from their junior ranks, and the truth is they have been on top up till now by virtue of being better in most events.
At this year's championships, watch out for the Australian men's team pursuit - in particular Jack Bobridge, who also goes in the non-Olympic (and therefore low-priority for Britain) individual pursuit. Bobridge made waves earlier this year, but his pursuit team-mates Luke Durbridge, Michael Hepburn and Leigh Howard are as talented and as dangerous.
Sprinter Meares is the brightest star from the previous Aussie track generation, although she's still only 27. She and Pendleton have been rivals for most of the decade - recently, Pendleton has had the better of the individual sprint but Meares has picked up golds in the team version.
Names like Amy Cure and Matthew Glaetzer, coming through the Australian ranks, have barely registered in Britain yet but will be worth a glance down the results lists later in the week. (Cure is in the Aussie women's endurance team, Glaetzer is a sprinter and may pop up in the keirin.)
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions
Is it just Britain versus Australia then?
To read the two countries' newspapers, you would imagine so. Everybody loves to play up this rivalry and our own interviews with both and - in which Pendleton suggests there is pressure on Meares, and Sutton ponders whether the Australian team pursuiters might get "a bit of a shock" - have been seized upon by the Australian press.
"Sutton and Pendleton have resorted to playing mind games with the potent Australian team," . "The stirring from the British camp should not be that surprising; the Australians have set a cracking pace since their disappointing Beijing campaign and topped the table at the past two world titles."
However, a fair number of the British team will be more worried about traditional powers France and Germany, particularly the men's sprinters. Hoy, Kenny and Co face a French sprint team led by the formidable force of Gregory Bauge, particularly up against Hoy.
Bauge, 26, has won at least one world title in each of the last five years but came second behind Hoy's mob in the Beijing team sprint, which can only increase his hunger for an Olympic gold. Florian Rousseau, three times an Olympic champion on the track for France and now Bauge's coach, (pardon my rickety translation from the French): "Greg keeps improving. He has more experience. He's still young but has a better understanding of himself, his emotions and how to manage them."
Beyond France, look at China in the women's sprint events and New Zealand in the team pursuits for both genders. summed up how open the competition is, saying: "As well as the superpowers of Australia, Great Britain and France, the big cycling nations of the Netherlands, Russia, Germany and Spain in particular are really improving fast with their track programmes.
"We believe we have prepared well and across the board we are ahead of where we were at this time before last year's world championships."
If I only have time to catch a couple of races, what will the big battles be?
Again, the Telegraph's Brendan Gallagher has compiled a to the events, and we have our own slightly more detailed .
But the big ones are:
Wednesday: Men's team pursuit (favourites Australia against GB and New Zealand) and men's sprint (France, Germany, Britain - toss a coin).
Thursday: Women's team pursuit (Britain out to get their world title back from Australia with a young team) and women's team sprint (Pendleton versus Meares, round one).
Friday: Will Hoy or Kenny be the faster Briton in the men's sprint? And can they beat their European rivals?
Saturday: Lots on - Ed Clancy in the omnium, Pendleton versus Meares round two in the women's individual sprint, Hoy in the men's keirin where he ought to win.
Sunday is the women's keirin. If Pendleton is going for gold medal number three by this point then it's probably been a decent week for Britain, but she won't be expecting that.
If I had to choose two, I'd pick the men's team pursuit and the women's individual sprint. But I already feel bad for leaving some others out.
Isn't the individual pursuit worth watching?
The individual pursuit has been dropped from the list of Olympic events, so it won't be contested at London 2012. Cycling's world governing body, the UCI, in late 2009 - introducing the omnium and levelling up the number of male and female medals on offer.
This doesn't stop you taking an interest in the non-Olympic events, of course, and Bobridge could smash his own individual pursuit world record on Thursday if the conditions are right.
And that bloke who had the splinter in his leg?
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions
Azizul Awang hasn't made the trip to the Worlds, which is unsurprising, given the grisly nature of his at last month's Track World Cup, but there was an outside chance for a time that he'd make it back.
earlier this month: "I am not competing in the World Championships as this is a muscle wound and I want to make sure I recover fully.
"But I am not deterred and I will come back aiming for the top again. The Olympics in London next year is still my major focus." When he does make his return, he'll be a challenger to Hoy in the men's keirin, the event in which he suffered the injury.
Comment number 1.
At 23rd Mar 2011, Jordan D wrote:I have to say it is disappointing that Team GB aren't competiting in all the events, like the Aussies. It says much about a mentality that only wants to win where it counts rather than to truly be the best and take on all comers. We can walk away knowing that we (Team GB) are set for next year, but we can't walk away and know that we dominate the sport. There's a big difference between the two and kudos to the Aussies for realising it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 23rd Mar 2011, hainba wrote:Firstly great to see some decent coverage from the ´óÏó´«Ã½.
Interesting the different strategies of the respective teams for these events.
Australia obviously believe success breeds success though the overall programme while GB are more event focused and reserving their efforts for key objectives as olympic hosts.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 23rd Mar 2011, In moderation wrote:I'm sorry to say we'll be lucky to pick up a gold, especially as we concentrate on so few. There are no bankers in the 10 events we are concentrating on and some absences will tell!
Still I'm reasonably optimistic for 2012- when we're REALLY switched on!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 23rd Mar 2011, Von_Mistelroum wrote:So in the cycling we'll be at least five or so golds down on what we won in Beijing? Or are GB just lulling the Aussies into a false sense of security?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 24th Mar 2011, Ollie Williams wrote:Hi all, thanks for the comments.
Jordan - I think sports purists would probably agree with you. If it's there to win then you should go all out to win it. But then, Britain would argue they're taking a realistic and pragmatic approach. The British public, and funding body UK Sport, only really care about winning Olympic medals. Nobody will remember the results of this Track Worlds in three years' time, but everyone will remember what happens in London and it'll dictate how much money British Cycling gets. With that in mind, why dilute your chances of success by spending money on events which won't help that?
I can see both sides of the coin though. The GB riders themselves in the non-Olympic events will still be doing everything they can to win, I can guarantee you that.
In moderation, and Von_Mistelroum - Wednesday was a disappointing first day, but it's too early to be despondent about British chances. Even if GB come away from here without a single gold medal, there are still so many variables that while a lack of golds would concern Britain, it wouldn't be the end of their world.
Things to bear in mind: there's still a whole season of track cycling to go after this one, beginning this coming autumn and culminating in the 2012 World Championships in Melbourne. Unlike many other sports, track cycling holds a Worlds in the same year as the Olympics. So this is not the last Worlds before the Games.
Also, home support on a home track counts to a big degree in track cycling. The increase in volume in this velodrome when Dutch cyclists get going isn't just noticeable, it's huge. A packed London velodrome next year will practically suck British cyclists over the line. I can't quantify how much of an advantage that will give them, but I'm pretty sure there will be one. (You could look at that the other way and suggest the pressure will be a negative factor, but British Cycling are very well set up psychologically. If any of Britain's Olympic teams is prepared to wrestle with competing on home turf, it's this lot.)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 26th Mar 2011, Jordan D wrote:Ollie - appreciate that you've come back to answer the comments made.
From the performances over the last few days, it appears that the attitude to only pay attention to the Olympic events isn't coming off; I appreciate that there is plenty of time left for things to come right (and I'd rather they peaked in London than in the Netherlands), the psychological advantage is definitely not going to be with Team GB currently.
Funding may be dependent on the Olympic only events, but taking along a strong team across the board allows individuals to come through in the public eye and be feted as champions if they win, rather than "also rans". Let's not forget this British cycling revolution started in 2000 with Jason Queally in an event that doesn't form part of the Olympics now.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)