Selection is a breeze for Britain's paddlers
"There are people living off their savings, trying to compete as full-time athletes, and they're putting a lot of their lives into one race. If things don't work out for them, it's a really big deal," says British canoeist Campbell Walsh.
"That's a life-changing moment and they have to decide: What do I do now?"
We will hear a lot about selection races over the next year. Most of Britain's Olympic hopefuls will face them, no matter their sport - some form of contest to determine the best of British, ready for the year of competitive international tournaments ahead.
Being selected makes or breaks the year for many athletes, but selectors in 2011 and 2012 could hold careers in their hands. This is Olympic qualification year and the athletes chosen to help Britain qualify get 12 months in the shop window for Olympic selection, a year later, where there are often fewer places available for the highest of stakes.
Canoe slalom's 2011 selection races took place at the 2012 Olympic course, in Lee Valley, this past weekend. made the team and, while Walsh would have expected that as one of the world's top 10, he knows not to underestimate the importance of these races.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash Installed. Visit ´óÏó´«Ã½ Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
Olympic bronze medallist Helen Reeves explains how to beat the 2012 slalom course
"This is not a formality at all," he continues. "There's a lot riding on it. I've just moved here from Nottingham to use this course. If I then wasn't to make the team for the year, that's a bit of a disaster: I've just invested in training here for the year, and I'm not even on the team.
"Every year it's a really big thing. All the parents on the bank, too - you can see them and they're just as on edge about it."
Walsh was never in too much danger of missing the team but that's because he's incredibly good, with his alongside a clutch of world and European medals. He has the skills and experience to cope with races like these.
But for fringe athletes, looking to break into the team and maybe clinch some precious funding for the first time, hearts barely leave mouths all weekend.
That was particularly the case last weekend as a vicious wind ripped through the course. Wind causes untold chaos to canoe slalom races: it sends the gates - through which canoeists must pass - swirling in the breeze, turning a course which was already one of the world's toughest into an unpredictable lottery.
"Conditions were very difficult," says Walsh. "The wind means you can't be accurate and paddle like normal. You always have to have a margin of error and leave room around the poles [which make up the gates].
"On my final run, the wind blew a pole and the judges deemed I didn't get my head around it in time [a race-ending 50-point penalty]. That meant I was effectively last instead of first.
"Because I'd secured my place in the team after days one and two I was racing with more aggression. If I hadn't, I'd have played it safe and given the poles more respect. But there are other people who maybe haven't the luxury of that speed in the bag and then they've got to push it. It's really, really hard on them."
Walsh, 33, is talking from the comfort of a wicker sofa on the pristine decking which marks out from your average canoe slalom course. If the wind would die down and the rapids disappear, we could be in a Caribbean retreat. Britain's top kayakers may be paddling for their futures in 30mph gusts, but at least they're doing it in impressive surroundings.
"When I was a youngster, we had a generator and floodlights that we'd have to put up every night to go training up in Scotland, in the freezing cold, on some tiny little ditch," says Walsh.
"Now we're at these amazing venues that sell Starbucks coffee. The sport's moved on at the top level. There is this hi-tech stuff like the [which ferry competitors from the bottom of the course to the top, without leaving their boats]. I'm amazed how many people stand and watch us going up the conveyor belt, even when there are other competitors going down the white water course."
But Walsh feels there is something still to be said for getting changed by the side of the road in the middle of nowhere, nice though the decking and conveyor belts are. He's hopeful that Lee Valley's comparative riches will come to be seen by children eager to learn the sport as the reward, rather than the norm.
"You need the grounding on the smaller water first," he says. "You can't just jump onto the water out there on the Olympic course, you'd get blown away. But it doesn't matter where you do it. When you get into the sport and into a boat and on the water, you've got that freedom to go where you want.
"You're not stuck to a linear sport - that was a big appeal to me, as was the play element. When you're learning to deal with whitewater you're surfing, you're playing in the water to get that feel, that subtle touch for the water. That hooked me."
Walsh hasn't had in Britain lately. His silver medal in Athens always crops up when he does get mentioned, but - who paddles in the C1 single canoe category (using one blade where Walsh uses two) - now enjoys most of the limelight having earned silver at Beijing 2008, where Walsh struggled.
"Within the sport I get more attention but the British media like to look at the more recent Olympic medallist," says Walsh. "I still find it really odd that I get referred to as an Olympic silver medallist all the time. That was seven years ago - it doesn't mean much now.
"You have to look at the results in a much shorter time-frame. I could have told everyone Dave Florence was a big favourite for a medal in Beijing but he wasn't getting any media attention just because he hadn't been to an Olympics before."
Walsh is a little more circumspect, however, when asked to predict his own fortunes this coming year. Next month brings the in Spain, followed by July's test event on the London 2012 course and September's in Slovakia.
He says: "At the moment there are two guys dominating men's kayak: of Italy and of Slovenia. But form fluctuates and they're beatable - I've had one race against them this year and I beat them.
"I'd love to win this year's World Championships. My first concern is to get the plans in place to train effectively, stay injury and illness-free. I have to get myself in good shape technically and physically so I can sit on the start line and know within myself that if I have a good run, I can win.
"And then I have to have that good run."
Comment number 1.
At 4th May 2011, scottish_in_the_toon wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 4th May 2011, JohnJack wrote:In Sailing, the Finn Class (which is where Ben Ainslie (currently ranked 45) competes), in the world top ten there are 3 British, 2 Croations, 1 Spanish, 2 French, 1 American and 1 New Zealander (Source: ISAF World Rankings). Under the Olympic rules only one competitor can compete from each country. Therefore potentialy only 6 of of the top 10 in the world can race. I feel that this makes the Olympics some sort of Circus Sideshow and dilutes the competition degrading the value of Olympic competition. Though I agree and believe in the spirit of the games and that all nations should have the chance to send a competitor in each sport however how much of a test is it where the competition is diluted so much?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 4th May 2011, Ollie Williams wrote:scottish_in_the_toon - Thanks.
JohnJack - This is a problem by no means unique to sailing. Track cycling is another excellent example: new rules from world governing body the UCI mean only one top rider (or team) per nation will compete in each event at 2012. So either Chris Hoy or Jason Kenny will ride for Britain in the men's sprint, but not both. Hoy is on record expressing his dismay at this, as are a number of others.
In three-day eventing, which I covered last week, the Badminton Horse Trials are a four-star event whereas the Olympics are only three-star. In other words, Badminton is ranked a harder event than the Games, for precisely the same reasons: more people per nation can compete at Badminton, so the field is tougher.
And in slalom canoeing, this year's test event on the Olympic course will have a stronger field than the Olympics itself, for the same reason again.
So you have a point: the Olympics is, in many sports, not the toughest event. But in order to win Olympic medals you have to prove you are the very best in your country (to take up that one available position) and then be the best of the best at the Games. You can argue it both ways. Yes, the field at the Games won't be the strongest. But you arguably have to have proved yourself worthy to even compete.
(And "proving yourself worthy", in a weak nation, may be much easier than in a strong nation. Hence your of this world. But that allows a wider range of nations to take part in each event, while theoretically the very best from each country should still be competing on their nation's behalf.)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 4th May 2011, noorwich wrote:Hi Oli,
your response is an intersting way to look at the events.
I do not mind this approach except for the fact it is not consistent across all sports. There are sports where you can qualify 3 competitors to sports with at most 1 participant from each country. With sports like Taekwondo, it is even possible for the world number 1 not to be competing as a country can only take 4 competitors across 8 disciplines!
I wish every event was open to the top 10 in the world rankings in a particular sport (limited to 3 per nation say). This would make the Olympics the toughest and most competitive fields in each event then.
Or the other option of 1 per nation in any event but imagine missing out on those Kenyan steeplechase or Chineese table tennis clean sweeps!
Also, would you say winning an event like in swimming is less of an achievement as the vast majority of competitors have multiple chances compared to a sport where the competitor only gets the 1 chance to win a gold?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 5th May 2011, JohnJack wrote:noorwich, Yes you are right, it is slightly inconsistant between sports. However it is easier to have a larger field of competitors is some event rather than others. Take Athletics, 100m, there are numerous heats which last 10s maybe a few (10) minutes if you include the prestart etc..... So there can be a fair few competitors. Imagine if the football tournement had entries from every nation who attended the games, it would be impracticle. So some pre qualification must go on.
Ollie, I think that you have to distinguish between the 'Team' sports and the 'Individual' sports. Team sports such as football, hockey, volleyball and so on, the competitors are essentialy representing the national team. Its the individual sports like sailing (mostly), tennis, track & field where the single competitor rule seems to hurt the competition. Track & Field probably slighly less as it is feasible to have a large number of competitors in most sports.
Going back to familiar ground for me, sailing. In the world top ten we (GBR) have three sailors. Giles Scott (3), Andrew Mills (7) and Ed Wright (5) however Ben Ainslie (45) has also put himself forward for selection, his ranking only reflects that he hasn't been competing due to being involved in the GB Americas Cup team until recently (rather the selectors than me having to choose who goes).
I think the point I am trying to make is, shouldn't (for individual sports) Olympic inclusion be based on skill and ability rather than the 'political' border you were born within.
I agree a norrwich, maybe the world top ten should have a 'free pass'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)