´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

Leading the way for disabled people?

Post categories:

Lady Bracknell | 16:36 UK time, Thursday, 24 August 2006

This Friday (25th August) is the closing date for nominations for the 2006 Remploy "Leading The Way" Awards: .

Now in its tenth year, the awards scheme is, "all about acknowledging, encouraging and advising organisations, of all sectors and sizes, who are adopting best practice and progressive thinking in the employment of disabled people."

There are two categories of award: organisational (small employer, medium employer, large employer, corporate employer, and one for organisations that promote learning and development of disabled people) and individual (business person, Jobcentre Plus employee and - oh, finally - disabled employee). To be eligible to nominate itself, an organisation must employ at least one disabled person.

Now, call Lady Bracknell a jaded old cynic if you will, but experience has taught her that there can be a huge difference between an employer's perception of how well it treats its disabled staff and the perception of its disabled employees themselves. And, given that the winners will benefit from an "externally verified recognition of their equal opportunities policies" and a "positive image of their organisations to existing and future customers", it's a bit of a worry that the online application form doesn't require a statement from a disabled member of staff confirming that everything their employer has just claimed about its marvellously inclusive policies is actually true. Whatever happened to "nothing about us without us", eh?

But perhaps Lady Bracknell is missing something. After all, Mat Fraser appears in all the photographs of last year's ceremony. And, given his reputation, it seems unlikely that he'd put his name to any initiative which relegates disabled people into a supporting role.

Comments

  • 1.
  • At 11:26 AM on 25 Aug 2006, Chris Page wrote:

I think you're right to be sceptical. I've experienced so-called "good practice" that was anything but good.

  • 2.
  • At 09:30 PM on 19 Dec 2006, John Last wrote:

I worked at RBS group until recently. They claim in their corporate responsibility website that they are working with NAS and REMPLOY. The results of the relationships are no workplacements for Remploy clients or prospects clients at RBS. Can someone please explain why. Why does REMPLOY give out an award without due dilligence.

This is an easy route to buying corporate responsibility and will save a company thousands of pounds as they will not have to spend money on educating their employees as people will think that they have done the hard work already. The awards should be stopped.

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.