´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

We've just

Eddie Mair | 10:10 UK time, Monday, 26 March 2007

moved the clock forward in the office. That's got to be a good sign.

Comments

  1. At 10:13 AM on 26 Mar 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

    Just so long as you don't do it twice!

  2. At 10:15 AM on 26 Mar 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Moved forward by how many desks, Eddie? Is it now team captain?

    I come back from Wales and find I'm now being linkd to the Today Programme. Is nothing sacred?

    I may have to change my name.

    BTW, having briefly noted your posting about the Day One Blog, do you seriously want me to own up?

  3. At 10:17 AM on 26 Mar 2007, wrote:

    Unless of course, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ time-keeping operative department had already sent someone around at the weekend & put the clock forward when the office was empty? So now you're an hour ahead?

  4. At 10:35 AM on 26 Mar 2007, Tom Harrop wrote:

    Eddie,

    About moving the clock forward. Did a ´óÏó´«Ã½ 'man' wearing a brown dust coat and a flat cap have to do it? Or are you allowed to do it yourself?

  5. At 10:39 AM on 26 Mar 2007, Val P wrote:

    So if I'm right Annasee, we'll have to listen between 4 & 5 instead of 5 & 6, just in case. Or, scratches head, would that be 6 & 7 instead, I can never work these things out...

  6. At 10:56 AM on 26 Mar 2007, Stewart M wrote:

    Just now put my watch right. Standing in bank and thought thats funny they dont open at 9.20 ;-o


  7. At 11:07 AM on 26 Mar 2007, Fearless Fred wrote:

    We're all assuming that they've only moved it one hour. What if they've decided to celebrate the 50th anniverary of the EU by doing the programme on European time?

  8. At 12:03 PM on 26 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Until I read all of your coments I was under the impression that the clock had been "moved" as a potential interviewee. I wondered had this been seconded. Would we be hearing an interview with the PM Office Clock this evening? Clearly I am a bit stupid sometimes.

  9. At 12:12 PM on 26 Mar 2007, wrote:

    Doesn't it fall on the floor when you move the clock forward, Eric? Mine does. We tried moving ours sideways instead but that just leads to a line of holes in the wall.

    Anyway, what is an hour in metres? And who dictates which way is forward? Just be grateful we don't live in E8 (the mathematical world, not the London postcode!)

    Belated equinoxial greetings to one and all.

  10. At 01:20 PM on 26 Mar 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Eddie:

    They forgot to adjust their clock in You and Yours. So, one up to the Mair team, eh?

  11. At 02:26 PM on 26 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Steve (9), How do you know we don't live in E8? Could I possibly live in E8 without realising it? Could this be why my life is a bit weird sometimes? I ask as one who got an A for O level maths but gave it up sharp after that!

  12. At 06:39 PM on 26 Mar 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Once again, an hour is taken from the middle of the night, and somebody in a comedy programme asks "and what will you do with the extra hour?"

    WHAT extra hour? I got an hour less sleep, not more.

    I want to know what They do with the 60 million or so hours They take from us every Spring. Sure, They give them back in the autumn, but where do They invest them during the months between, and at what rate of interest? I think we should be told!

    (Always up for a good conspiracy theory, me.)

  13. At 11:39 PM on 26 Mar 2007, wrote:

    Does no-one use the studio at weekends then? Or weren't they bovvered?

  14. At 08:29 AM on 27 Mar 2007, Fearless Fred wrote:

    Chris (12) Never mind the hours, I want to know when we can get back the 13 days that were stolen in thew 1800s!

  15. At 09:28 AM on 27 Mar 2007, wrote:

    FFred - Blimey, I didn't know you were that old!

  16. At 11:23 AM on 27 Mar 2007, Val P wrote:

    Ffred - if it's all the same to you, please may I have my extra 13 days in the run up to my next birthday in June? Always a good month to have a bit more of :o)

  17. At 01:10 PM on 27 Mar 2007, Fearless Fred wrote:

    RJD (15) I wear the years well, don't you think?!? :-P

    ValP (16) Sounds like a good plan to me. Although I'd plump for later in the year myself, say around late August...

  18. At 06:07 PM on 27 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    As long as we can have the extra days in the summer I don't mind when precisely they are. I do realise that nobody asked what I thought but there you go anyway...

    Apparently that was maliciously fast.

  19. At 11:38 PM on 27 Mar 2007, Val P wrote:

    This is an equal opportunity blog Appy, you don't have to be asked!

  20. At 12:26 AM on 30 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Talking of "good signs", my three all-time favourites, in reverse order:

    3. (In a bar, next to some speakers one might not otherwse have noticed) "Do not touch these speakers".

    2. (A road sign) "This sign is out of order".

    1. (A city centre notice) "Do not read this sign".

    What a bizarre world.

  21. At 03:59 PM on 30 Mar 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Mine was in the Ladies at minchinhampton Golf Club - over the hand basins
    'Please do not wash balls in these basins'
    Rejoice
    PS I DO NOT PLAY GOFF

  22. At 04:33 PM on 30 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Well, you wouldn't, would you Aunt D? Not with dirty balls anyway...

  23. At 04:35 PM on 30 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    I bet you would if you could find somewhere to wash your balls...

  24. At 04:51 PM on 30 Mar 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Appy, you sadly misjudge me if you think I wouldn't......

  25. At 06:24 PM on 30 Mar 2007, RJD wrote:

    LADIES - PLEASE!

  26. At 06:35 PM on 30 Mar 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    ...although I might use tongs....

  27. At 12:44 AM on 31 Mar 2007, Val P wrote:

    Sounds painful to me, Aunt D? Not that I'd.......

  28. At 11:18 AM on 31 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Aunt D, I'm afraid I don't understand. How can one control the direction of a pair of tongs with a golf club???

  29. At 12:31 PM on 31 Mar 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ladies, the Club Secretary has asked me to remind you that the only guests permitted on the course are those with their own balls accompanied by a member.

  30. At 02:57 PM on 31 Mar 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    RJD, you know the drill and you know the way. We should rename it the RJD corner...

    :-)

  31. At 06:59 PM on 31 Mar 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    tee hee hee hee

  32. At 10:03 PM on 31 Mar 2007, Val P wrote:

    Ha ha ha ha ha! What a shower :o)

  33. At 11:52 PM on 31 Mar 2007, RJD wrote:

    Can I take my Mashie Niblock with me?

  34. At 01:43 AM on 01 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Ceratinly not RJD! You will sit still and quietly contemplate your behaviour!

  35. At 11:37 AM on 01 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Or, as Si would say ((.)) - his navel?

  36. At 05:14 PM on 01 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Don't you mean Naval?

  37. At 06:34 PM on 01 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Gosh Ap (34) - I sort of like it when you're cross with me ;o)

  38. At 01:00 AM on 02 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Aunt D (36), Hahaha!

    RJD (37), hmm, very clever -- I'm snookered now. (And those are the wrong sort of balls, even if they are very clean...)

  39. At 11:56 AM on 02 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    I'm speechless - and that doesn't happen often ;-}

    Blame it on the Niblock.

  40. At 01:18 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Humph wrote:

    In that case, Appy (38), what you should do is grasp one end of the cue firmly in one hand, place your other hand near one of the balls and slid the cue back and forth along it. A smooth action will help the shot.

    Hello RJD, I didn't expect to see you here!

    H.

  41. At 01:59 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    RJD! Humph! Sit still over there, do not look at each other, do not speak, do not snigger, do not even think about balls! :-)

  42. At 02:27 PM on 02 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ap - I don't want to sit in the same corner as Humph - he's just rude!

    By the way, if you are truly snookered, I could probably demonstrate a solution but it involves bouncing off a lot of cushions and I couldn't say with any certainty where the balls would finish.


  43. At 02:35 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Humph wrote:

    Well Appy (41) if I am to play the part of Cinderella does that make you the Evil Step-mother or one of the Ugly Sisters? ;-P

    H.

  44. At 03:01 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Humph wrote:

    RJD (42)

    I believe the pot said to the kettle:
    "Although clearly your made out of metal
    When viewed from back here
    Your colour, it's clear,
    Is black and on that you must settle!"

    H.

  45. At 03:02 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    No, Humph, I'm one of the dwarves...

    RJD, do you want to in there over Easter?

  46. At 03:19 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Appy and others, 38 and elsewhere:

    Just to clarify the postion, and quoting from the rules:

    "the device used to mark the position of a ball being cleaned shall be regarded as and acquire the value of the ball until such time as the ball has been cleaned and replaced. If any player other than the striker should touch or disturb the device, he shall be penalised as if he were the striker, without affecting the order of play. The referee shall return the device or ball being cleaned to its position, if necessary, to his satisfaction, even if it was picked up."

    I hope that's all a bit clearer now

  47. At 04:30 PM on 02 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Humph (44) - Honestly it's not me - It's Ap. She takes every innocent remark I make and deliberately misinterprets it. Just watch – I’ll prove it!

    Ap (45) The dwarves weren’t in Cinderella. They were in Snow White.

  48. At 04:47 PM on 02 Apr 2007, nikki noodle wrote:

    tee hee!!

    *wipes tear away*

    thanks, peeps, I haven't laughed so much for ages..!

    n-n
    xx

  49. At 06:23 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    It didn't say anything about washing devices in the basins.....perhaps they thought Ladies don't have devices, or if they have, that they only require a bit of buffing now and again.
    Obviously the sign writer was male.

  50. At 08:41 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Buffed Devices - hmmm, sounds as intriguing as Miffed Balearics, eh RJD?

  51. At 09:17 PM on 02 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    I'm just totally lost about these devices - buffed as per Aunt Dahlia or otherwise. As for Big Sister's devices for marking the position of cleaned / moved balls, I'm afraid it is way above my head. I'll just continue to rely on harvest Y-fronts.

  52. At 09:25 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Hey! I've never been anywhere near Snow White! The mere suggestion makes me feel a little Grumpy..

    (Well, I would've hated to make a fibber of you RJD...)

    :-)

  53. At 10:21 PM on 02 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ap - And how does the little Grumpy react?

  54. At 11:02 PM on 02 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    He feels Bashful and Happy, of course.

  55. At 12:20 AM on 03 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Oh Ap, you really are sharp!

  56. At 06:21 AM on 03 Apr 2007, Humph wrote:

    I know RJD (47)! The point of my post (44) is that I am as innocent as you. We all suffer Appyrisms on this Frog. For example, if I was to thank Fifi for those delightful pictures of her black pussy yesterday, I would be in the naughty corner until Christmas. It is JUST NOT FAIR! :,-(

    H.

  57. At 08:41 AM on 03 Apr 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    I know just what you mean, Humph. Yesterday I'd been thinking of commenting on Stewart's lovely Venice photo. It put me in mind of Saturday's upcoming Boat Race, with all those hunky young men giving it all they've got, and the cox going 'in' and 'out'. Such energy, such vigour!

    But I knew I'd be misunderstood.

  58. At 02:51 PM on 03 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Ah, but Humph, Big Sis, the fact that you knew you would be sent to the naughty corner belies your innocence. You are bad girls and boys and no mistake sbout it!

    As for the chap who used the expression "harvest Y-fronts", I think he needs special help. I mean, that corn husk's gotta chafe, no?

  59. At 03:27 PM on 03 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ap - No chafing at all and that's the point. Harvest Y-fronts - "All Is Safely Gathered In. "

  60. At 03:40 PM on 03 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    No no no, that's winter draws on.... where were you brought up.
    Don't answer that.

  61. At 03:59 PM on 03 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    RJD, hahahaha. And then the vicar leads the congregation in celebration.

  62. At 05:14 PM on 03 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Aunt Dahlia - Not so much brought up as dragged up!

  63. At 05:40 PM on 03 Apr 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    .... and perhaps should have been left there, RJD? ;o)

  64. At 10:04 PM on 04 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    So where do these harvest y-fronts come into it?

  65. At 11:31 PM on 04 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Val P - You are clearly not paying attention!

    cf "the harvest bra" for the amply proportioned female - "All Is Safely Gathered In. "

  66. At 12:07 AM on 05 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Do these harvest bras have blue straplines?

  67. At 08:42 AM on 05 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Well your stapline was certainly blue - you tell me!

  68. At 01:21 PM on 05 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    On the contrary -- yesterday's straps were pale pink. Today I am still in my PJs!!! :-)

  69. At 04:13 PM on 05 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Pale pink I could cope with but I have this thing about cyan.

  70. At 05:07 PM on 05 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Cyanide?
    Cyanose?
    Cyanara?
    Now why does that remind me of Ernest Dowson?

  71. At 06:25 PM on 05 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Aunt Dahlia

    "Non Sum Qualis eram Bonae Sub Regno Cynarae"

    'I am no more the man I was in the reign of the Good Cynara'

    Gosh this blog is truly educational. Thank you


  72. At 11:25 PM on 05 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Ah - I see, all is now revealed, cyan. Also re harvesting. Yes ve-ery slow the last couple of days. Must be time for a tweak or a tune-up?

  73. At 11:44 AM on 06 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    I also commented upon Aunt D's educational posting (thanks), but it seems mine hasn't appeared -- probably because I'd promised elsewhere that RJD could have the last word here. Ah.

  74. At 02:39 PM on 06 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    I was actually thinking of 'I have been faithful to thee Cynara, in my fashion'
    Three little words that conjure up such a huge range of possibilities. Should go alongside 'Up to a point, Lord Copper'.
    Now lets get back to the double entendres please....I am working you know, and need a few laughs..

  75. At 11:15 AM on 10 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Word

  76. At 08:14 PM on 10 Apr 2007, Chris the Pickle wrote:

    I think you should all change your names to Jacob... well, it's clear you're all crackers.

    Anyway, thanks for the many laughs contained herein, I've got a stitch now.

    RJD, I realise this is probably not welcome from your point of view as you wanted the last Word.

    And so you shall have it:

    RJD's Word.

  77. At 12:04 PM on 11 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Oh no he won't.....

  78. At 03:04 PM on 11 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Aunt Dahlia - After much deliberation I have come to the conclusion that this harsh, gruff persona that you portray is totally false. I am convinced that when the veneer of malice and spite is peeled away, we will discover that you really are quite nasty.

    Now leave this thread alone. Ap said I could have it.

  79. At 02:16 PM on 12 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Oh, alright.
    (slouches off, snickering)

  80. At 12:19 AM on 13 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Strewth!

  81. At 03:51 PM on 18 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Oh, I forgot, other peanutty chocolate bars are available.

  82. At 11:46 PM on 22 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    I believe the London Chocolate Bar was run only this very morning :o)

  83. At 03:15 PM on 24 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Oh Bog Off you lot! I checked this for a few days and thought it was safe. Have you nothing better to do than trawl all the way back here to annoy me?

    As Muttley used to say when he was a bit narked at Dick Dastardly :"Rassanfrassenrasserfrass"

  84. At 06:34 PM on 24 Apr 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Nope

  85. At 11:06 PM on 24 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    You mustn't be getting audited often enough, or you'd be too busy to look for us RJD?

    So how does the trap work? An RJD trap for heffalumps?

  86. At 07:43 PM on 25 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Now you're just being silly, you two! I'm going off to find a thread that both of you don't know about and I'll have the last word there!

  87. At 10:31 PM on 29 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    How satisfying would that be though? No-one will be there to read it??

  88. At 11:53 PM on 29 Apr 2007, wrote:

    Val P - Excatly! I'm the only one who knows where it is!

  89. At 02:34 PM on 01 May 2007, wrote:

    Gone then have they? Good!

  90. At 03:16 PM on 01 May 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    That's what you think, RJD!

  91. At 03:32 PM on 01 May 2007, wrote:

    Strewth! -again.

  92. At 03:51 PM on 01 May 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Shhhhhhhh, don't let on ........

  93. At 05:57 PM on 15 May 2007, RJD wrote:

    what?

  94. At 07:01 PM on 25 May 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    mmmmm.. a litle flighty footwork going on here.... you just have to win don't you? Well I haven't forgiven you for that heartrending story you wrote and didn't attribute many Sundays ago. We camels have very long memories, and bear grudges and umbrage, let no axe go unburied is our motto.
    (What is that in Latin, since you have it?) I rather fancy that on my coat of arms.

  95. At 11:49 AM on 25 Jun 2007, RJD wrote:

    Let no axe go unburied
    "Permissum haud securis vado inhumatus"

    But surely if you hold onto grudges and umbrage you wouldn't want axes buried!

    Let no axe be buried
    "Permissum haud securis exsisto seputus"

  96. At 12:54 PM on 25 Jun 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Is this an RJD retrospective?

  97. At 01:23 PM on 10 Aug 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ah - alone at last!

  98. At 01:32 PM on 10 Aug 2007, AlterEgo wrote:

    Are you sure you are alone?

  99. At 01:33 PM on 10 Aug 2007, RJD wrote:

    Absolutely postive! Wait a minute - who said that?

  100. At 01:39 PM on 10 Aug 2007, AlterEgo wrote:

    I'm afraid it was me.

  101. At 01:55 PM on 10 Aug 2007, the clone wrote:

    no - it was I.

  102. At 02:05 PM on 10 Aug 2007, RJD wrote:

    I'm confused now. Are you me or I am me?

  103. At 02:08 PM on 10 Aug 2007, doppleganger wrote:

    Oh Lord! Now there's two of me, one of him and a clone of one of the three of us. Whose turn is it?

  104. At 02:12 PM on 10 Aug 2007, Jiggery Pokery wrote:

    Someone say something?

  105. At 02:21 PM on 10 Aug 2007, AlterEgo wrote:

    I'm sure I already said just that - didn't I?

  106. At 02:23 PM on 10 Aug 2007, Big Sister wrote:

    Hm, So we have an AlterEgo, a Clone, and a RJD. "Very interesting - but stupid!"

  107. At 02:43 PM on 10 Aug 2007, RJD wrote:

    I was in court the other day, when suddenly this chap burst in with a big long scarf wrapped around his head and neck. He went quietly but very deliberately and speedily around the courtroom squeezing the breasts of all the females present. He then left as quickly as he had come - and nobody said a word and not one of the courtroom attendants paid any heed to him.

    I turned to the Resident Magistrate and said "Who on earth was that and why didn't someone stop him?"

    He looked at me and said, "Oh don't worry about that. That's just the muffled titter that sometimes runs around the court"

  108. At 03:07 PM on 10 Aug 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

    RJD - Appy passed on your message, was trying to find an opportune moment to say thanks and this is probably it! xx

  109. At 03:49 PM on 10 Aug 2007, RJD wrote:

    witchiwoman - I thnk Marc may already have twigged that it was mac by the time I got through to him. I think mac is just a bit of a pain. Obviously very intelligent, but I think lacking in common sense and can be abusive rather than funny. I just don't talk to him.

    A lot of months ago, somebody pretended to be Appy and I know that it can be upsetting.

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.