We're having a whip-round
to pay the 50 grand fine we have to cough up thanks to Blue Peter. I am putting the fiver from the Eurovision sweep into the kitty. Please pledge as much as you can by clicking comment.
Eddie Mair | 13:06 UK time, Monday, 9 July 2007
to pay the 50 grand fine we have to cough up thanks to Blue Peter. I am putting the fiver from the Eurovision sweep into the kitty. Please pledge as much as you can by clicking comment.
Jump to more content from this blog
PM The evening news and current affairs programme presented by Eddie Mair.
iPM The programme that starts with its listeners. Join the discussions online and contribute ideas for a weekly programme presented by Eddie Mair and Jennifer Tracey.
Read the final report of the PM Privacy Commission.
Meet the commissioners, view the terms of reference and hear the Commission Chair Sir Michael Lyons explain his approach.
´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Is this cos of the quiz they rigged? Dock the salaries of those that did it.
why don't you organise a phone in competition to raise the money? Which one of these was not a Blue Peter Presenter?
(a) Valerie Singleton
(b) John Noakes
(c) Alistair Campbell
I've got a bag full of milk bottle tops.
Washed.
I'm with Stewart M on this one.Don't see why any of my Licence money should go towards it, let alone chipping in to help out.
How much are we pledging each time we click on comments? Can you answer this in another thread because I am not sure that I can afford to come back to this one in case it is costing too much.
H.
Why not charge Alistair Campbell £50,000 for the ´óÏó´«Ã½ air-time he's getting for his latest work of fiction..?
Stewart M and admin annie
No way - it is the responsibility of the employer/broadcasters - the ´óÏó´«Ã½ has to pay. The guilty can be disciplined but not made to pay the fine.
I'll pledge my complete collection of Eddie Mair clips, to be auctioned on *Bay.
That should go a long way towards covering it.
With Stewart and admin annie on this one.
Just been having a look through last weeks ariel (´óÏó´«Ã½ in - house magazine) thought these snippets may be interesting.
'Talent costs have emerged as a significant issue for ´óÏó´«Ã½ Radio.' I think we are talking more Jonathan Ross/Terry Wogan - than Eddie, but I may be wrong
The average salary of a ´óÏó´«Ã½ employee is £42,062
£2.32bn a years ´óÏó´«Ã½ Television.
£563.6m a years ´óÏó´«Ã½ Radio
Jenny Abramsky salary £316,000 + (13,000 expenses)
Mark Thompson £624,000 + £164,000 (other)
TAL, are the employers allowed to fine the guilty party as a form of discipline or are we just talking written warnings here?
I pledge £10,000 for every genuine apology in Alastair Campbell’s book in regard to anything to do with the dossier concoction, build up and execution of the Iraq war.
What a !
xx
ed
Ae fond kiss, and then we sever;
Ae fareweel, and then for ever!
Deep in heart-wrung tears I'll pledge thee,
.
--Robert Burns
;-)
ed
Truly malicious, I guess. Five times so.
Amateur Lawyer (7), If by "disciplined" you mean "sacked" and thus their salaries used to pay said fine, then I am content.
Peej - ROTFL!
How about a PM Bring and Buy Sale?
I've got an old Action Man (other positionable plastic dolls are available) I could donate...
;o) []
I can't remember whether I've heard this rumour, or started it...
Anyway, I believe it's possible Paris Hilton would give an interview to PM IF the "Beeb" allowed her to pay £50,000 for doing so.
A potentially difficult one this...
Ms Hilton plus £50,000 with nothing meaningful being said for 5-minutes vs. Mr Campbell minus £50,000 with nothing meaningful being said for 5-minutes
Decisions, decisions...
admin annie - Depends what is in their Conditions of Employment / Disciplinary Procedures. My guess is that no tribunal would let a fine like this be transferred to an employee.
Aperitif - Can't argue with that. Other than to say, if you sack people, they are usually replaced. So no cost benefit there.
Eddie, you're using the fiver from the Eurovision sweep.....is this to make your prize untraceable in the event that voting for Eurovision was also rigged? Surely not!
Okay....hands up....it does look a teensy bit malicious!
Lawyer (17), I'm not so sure -- in my experience, if workers are replaced, it is almost always by someone cheaper. This is one of the few cases where (with my flippant hat on, I admit) I really wouldn't mind!
jonnie, I remember the fuss when Michael Checkland's (I think it was) salary went over £100,000
Eric, do I really want to know what you do with your whip?
jonnie, I remember the fuss when the then Director General Michael Checkland's (I think it was) salary went over £100,000.
But that WAS a while ago...
That eurovision money was spent ages ago.As usual can't remember what for or when but I distinctly remember something.
Am I alone in thinking that this was a harsh fine given the scale of the offence? Considering Richard&Judy only got fined £150,000 for (IMHO) a much more egregious violation of rules - they blatantly and repeatedly allowed people to carry on voting for a quiz even after the winner had been chosen - BP can feel rather hard done by.
Aperitif @ 19
Hope this need for £50,000 isn't used as an excuse to deny the froggers "T-shirts"/stickers/badges etc
If it is, we'll ALL have been well and truly DONE...
Hear hear Piper!
I'm concerned that BP will be made to suffer by having it's budget withheld. Will supplies of stickyback plastic dwindle? And will they have to make cuts in their Advent candleabra (only two candles?). Will one of the pets have to be put down to save on costs?
Si.
Hmm Si (27), When I watched BP they had only three presenters. I believe the modern fashion is for 4. Perhaps putting down one of the presenters would be an easy saving? :-)
Why isn't there a provident fund for this purpose into which all ´óÏó´«Ã½ emplyees would have to pay in?
Only asking.
Why doesn't Tony Ferney learn a) to spell right - "employees", and b) not to use tautological prepositions - "into & in", especially at the end of a sentence?
I trust he will heed this warning.
Appy (28)
I only remember 2 BP presenters - Christopher Trace and Valerie Singleton. When PM reduced its number of presenters from 2 to 1 I thought it was a cost-cutting exercise. I hadn't realised it was to subsidise BP. No wonder they looked first to Eddie for financial support.
You could be right, Mr Tickle, you could be right...
Don't have a telly and have't seen BP since Iwas a kid so don't know if they still have that absolutely awful, ugly doll Hambell? Well. if they do I might be persuaded to cough up a few bob to pay them to have her put down to prevent the present generation of kids being as bored and traumatised as I was when Val made her a new outfit Alternatively if she has been put into mothballs they could threaten to reinstate her unless the the public pay 50 grand to stop them!!
Or how about digging up one of the bones Shep hid in the BP garden and auctioning it off?
Jennie,
Hambell was Play School and I believe she is lost. BigTed, Little Ted, Humpty and Jemima (with a imitation hambell) Live in the National Media Museum. As do Zippy and George!
I think 4 BP presenters is something to do with more days on air. So they need to extra body.
Does not explain why PM does 5 days (and a half if you include saturdays) with one (and a half if you include saturdays) Presenters.
I remember the days of John Knoakes, Peter Purvis and Valerie Singleton, and a few of the ones that came afterwards.
Val went on to greater things, though.
;o)