´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

OOOh It's the royal wedding....

Carolyn Quinn | 10:36 UK time, Friday, 29 April 2011


Gillianian writes:

Thought these might be appropriate for the Blog - the happy couple, as imagined by some pre-school children!

Regards, Gillianian.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Nice hats!

  • Comment number 2.

    Delightful, Gillianian, thank you and thanks Carolyn for posting them.

    Didn't Kate look absolutely lovely? Got everything exactly right - very Princess Grace-esque. Wonderful that William chose to wear the Irish Guards uniform - I'm sure that will mean a lot to everyone in Ireland.

  • Comment number 3.

    We KNEW she'd have a lace dress!
    Thanks, Carolyn ;o)

  • Comment number 4.

    The major part of the today programme, nearly all ´óÏó´«Ã½ radio channels and when the wedding was over the news at one on radio 4 was predominantly about the wedding and now PM is all about the wedding again OVER THE TOP

  • Comment number 5.

    The kids were spot on, Gillianian - Perhaps they'd been tipped the wink by Sarah?

  • Comment number 6.

    ...a really.....triffick day, well done to all involved......!
    DiY

  • Comment number 7.

    peterstick7 - Not unexpected though! I believe Radio 3 maintained a normal schedule, expect that to face cuts in the immediate to medium future ;-)

  • Comment number 8.

    Gillianian, was that "knowing" from having doilies at the ready?

    peterstick, do get over yourself. This was a fabulous day for all sorts of reasons. Don't be an old stick in the mud, chill out, enjoy and join millions who simply want to celebrate!

  • Comment number 9.

    8 Lady Sue
    I thought your earlier remark about the Irish Guards was tongue in cheek ... maybe it wasn't, but certainly it should have been. It's great lots of people had fun today and I certainly appreciated the day off work, but this is no way to organise a society. It's no accident that Labour former prime ministers weren't invited; the traditional ruling establishment is back in charge, brimming with confidence and rubbing our noses in it.

  • Comment number 10.

    Johann Hari of the Independent makes the case against the feudal state as competently as ever. Unfortunately he had to turn to an American alternative/lefty programme to get more than a two minute curiosity slot on tv.

  • Comment number 11.

    lucien@9: how could you think my comment "tongue in cheek" and why would you? Why on earth do you think "it certainly should have been"? Simply can't understand what you mean and trying not to be totally insulted and offended by what you've said. Everyone is delighted by this marriage. It was a huge honour that William chose to wear the Irish Guards uniform and means such a lot - I hope you are not belittling this. No one is rubbing noses in anything. You are sounding like a fool.

  • Comment number 12.

    11 LS
    I didn't mean to insult or offend you and I apologise if I did. It just seems to me to be a bit of a stretch to imagine that many Irish people would be bowled over by the prince's association with a military unit named in recognition of Ireland's place in the British empire. I know you live in the Republic so if you tell me that Irish people were genuinely cheered by William's choice of attire then I will happily accept that.

    Everyone may be delighted by the marriage but a small but significant proportion of us are deeply opposed to the monarchy and the system of deference and privilege which it sustains. Maybe I sound like a fool but Polly Toynbee puts the intelligently in her column just posted on the Guardian website.

  • Comment number 13.

    I felt very proud of our heritage today. In every way a real spectacle which I thoroughly enjoyed. For those, like me, who had the chance to watch it on ´óÏó´«Ã½1 HD it was even more awe inspiring. The camera work, shots inside the abbey - and the whole procession outstanding. I doubt however - after listening to 'more or less' that the anticipated viewing figures were as high as some of the predications.

    Lucien has a very valid point though. The guest list had some glaring omissions. It's also questionable what message is sent out from today’s show of affluence to those struggling with the prospect of no employment and trying to keep a roof over their heads. It was also interesting that four of our guests staying in the B&B were keen to avoid the whole wedding and scuttled off early to do some shopping and walk down a quiet beach..

  • Comment number 14.

    I'm afraid I am left cold by the whole thing. Nice that an heir to the throne is hitched to a nice lass. Other than that... yawn. I made custard for a wedding-free-zone lunch hosted by a Kiwi friend, and washed the car, on a day when I'd otherwise have been at the office fed-up because the students and tutors necessary to me doing my job are off on holiday!

    The roads were pretty quiet. Other than that ... business as usual really. Sorry to be a wet blanket but that's how I feel! ;o)

  • Comment number 15.

    I've just read through the Polly Toynbee article Lucien linked to previously



    It's certainly well worth a read and also very refreshing that in the comments section she responds to readers comments.

    To one readers response Polly replied :

    Yes, I did think about being too curmudgeonly. It's not that we can't have fun - let's all have all the fun we can manage. But must the day of national celebration be all about the fun of the House of Windsor, with our nose pressed up against the telly, watching the monied conservative world in triumph?

    Fair point?

  • Comment number 16.


    I think I heard someone [on the ´óÏó´«Ã½] say that this wedding reflects what it means to be British today (or something like that). I was utterly bemused ...

  • Comment number 17.

    What I found astonishing is that Frances Osborne, Samantha Cameron and 'Princess William' were all educated at the same school (Marlborough College).

  • Comment number 18.

    16
    I've been hearing codswallop like that all day Sid.

  • Comment number 19.

    9. lucien desgai

    I agree with you mate.
    These occasions are meticulously planned and the snubbing of Labour politicians was deliberate.

  • Comment number 20.

    Neglecting to invite the two recent Prime Ministers was a huge mistake. It will not help the reputation of the monarchy, in the eyes of many subjects.

    That being said. There is no country on the planet that can put on pageantry like Great Britain! It was a superb show!

  • Comment number 21.

    The 2008 Summer Olympics at Beijing were impressive? Pageantry aside, Ellis, do you think we can really justify the expense in our current economic climate? Radio 3 excluded! Though I agree the pageantry was a 'superb show'

  • Comment number 22.

    Apologies for the last one - I presumed HTML was working...

  • Comment number 23.

    Regardless of what some posters say, not everyone is delighted by the marriage. Some people kiss up to anything the ´óÏó´«Ã½ does. I did, however, enjoy the music and played it through my stereo to annoy the neighbors. I have an old LP of music for Royal occasions that I got in the ?1970s. I thought William's uniform made him look like something from Ruritania and he should have worn his RAF uniform. Maybe I say that because our daughter's partner was on guard near the Cenotaph with an Air Force contingent.

    jonnie Thanks for the Facebook advice elsewhere. My wife uses it, but I don't.

  • Comment number 24.

    I watched the CBS evening news rebroadcast on Sky News last night. It was anchored from London and the only stories covered were the storms in the American south and the wedding. The nearest it came to the middle east was a trail for an interview with a CBS reporter who was assaulted in Tahrir square. Truly appalling.

  • Comment number 25.

    Ln 19, Don't get me wrong, I quite like Ken Clarke, but what has he done that got him an invite to the wedding? I don't particularly like Brown or Blair, but thought as former PMs they should have been invited. I mean, after all, the Beckams were there.

  • Comment number 26.

    25. davmcn

    If AV had been used to select who got invited, would Clegg, Cameron or Ken Clark have been on the guest list.

  • Comment number 27.

    Ln 26, They would still be counting the votes.

  • Comment number 28.

    Gillianian, perhaps you could ask the children to give us their version of the balcony kiss?

  • Comment number 29.

    Gillianian, preferably with no Uri Geller effects.

  • Comment number 30.

    Ln, We wil not, I repeat WILL NOT, be at the BBQ at U No Where today. We are watching a rerun of the tape of the 'Royal' wedding in reverse. I particularly liked the silly grins on the faces of Harry and Wills (our future King) throughout and their asides to each other. Too bad they didn't know there was a lipreader present to interpret them.

  • Comment number 31.

    Sorry if I offended any royalists here. I'll bet some are quite annoyed that they didn't get invited to the wedding. I mean, after all, titles are titles, inherited or married in to.

  • Comment number 32.

    Ooooh at last, something has knocked the Royal Wedding off the news agenda.

  • Comment number 33.

    Hmmm...I'd better find another spoon then...

  • Comment number 34.

    An Osama Bin Ladle would do nicely.

  • Comment number 35.

    34. lucien desgai

    Very good, made me smile. :-)

  • Comment number 36.

    ld 34, We have an Osama Bin Liner.

  • Comment number 37.

    34. lucien desgai

    ..you stirring it or what?

    ;o)

  • Comment number 38.

    I see fergie was disappointed in not having received an invite to the wedding she could have have touted on.

  • Comment number 39.


    I see John Lewis are having a summer bed-linen spectacular ...

  • Comment number 40.

    Another spoon figure ...

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.