Forgotten concepts
- 22 Jan 08, 09:33 GMT
I was searching for a photograph in the 大象传媒's online stills library yesterday when I accidentally stumbled across photographs of the Psion Ace.
This was a concept model from 2001, built to show the potential of 3G technology and future PDA designs. Sadly, the Ace never saw the light of day because in the same year Psion dropped out of the PDA business due to pressure from competitors.
But for a numbers of years this British company was the top dog in the emerging PDA market - creating the Psion Organiser, developing the basis of the Symbian operating system and helping pave the way for mobile markets such as GPS and portable media players.
There's a really in The Register's archives by Andrew Orlowski, which outlines the plans Psion had for its final machine, the Protea project.
But coming across the Psion Ace made me wonder about other concepts which never went from design to execution, and technologies which were built but never sold...
What about the original Sony/Nintendo console the companies made together before the PlayStation? Or the aptly-named console?
If you have information about such products, leave a comment and any links to photos and we'll do a round-up later in the week.
UPDATE: at Jupiter Research (and formerly of Psion) has e-mailed me to point out that the Protea wasn't Psion's final consumer product. It was, in fact, the codename for the Psion Series 5.
He also throws light on the Ace. Apparently it was "the codename for a small, light, mass market handheld designed to compete with Palm".
He said it led to the , and that the Ace drawings were never a serious project within Psion.
Thanks for the info Ian.
This post is closed to new comments.
The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comments
Aside from the obligatory "Whatever happened to all the good stuff MS promised for Vista" how about the Acorn RISC PC 2? The killer machine that died stillborn :(
I remember an april fool that was on tomorrows world that showed the presenter offering a cube not much bigger than a sugar cube as the way to store music, can't remember how many CD's worth it held. Found it quite funny then, whatever happened to the cube?
Strangely enough they actually produced it and it was on 大象传媒 Click. Good size but the review said the sound quality was only okayish.
There are a few images of the standalone console that Sony made that was to play CD games and SNES games. It was originally going to be called "PlayStation", but Nintendo deemed that Sony wanted too much of the CD-ROM revenue and ended the business relationship.
I don't think that cube thing was an April fool, it was a forerunner for 3D Solid state storage, which is still being researched today. High density flash storage is becoming increasingly popular (notably as a very expensive option on the new Macbook Air) so it seems Tomorrows World may have actually got on right. I'm still waiting for my Roboslave and flying car though.
"whatever happened to the cube?"
Packard Bell marketed it as an MP3 Player, I remember seeing one in dixons.
:-0
Hi, thanks for the article and the links, as a fervent "psionist" I'm one of the sad grey men still using a five, a seven, a netbook and even a netbook pro (a bit of betrayal that one) all my phones are nokia (symbian) or palm handspring (that one just died), worst I was a strong Agenda Microwriter before that, and by the way why not remind us of this other great brit's sucess/failure.
yours for Psion an Microwriter.
Michel Dudropt
I remember all the hype back in the 'almost' days of a Nintendo/Sony team up. If you take a look at the size, and colour of the SuperNES system and the original PS1 system, you'll see quite a resemblance. From what I understand, Nintendo screwed Sony out of the deal because they wanted their system out A.S.A.P. Sony said no, we should wait and the deal fell through. Also due to hardware issues if I'm not mistaken. Those were also the days of the Panasonic 3D0 console, Atari Jaguar-*snicker* and a few other old systems that never got to where they could have.
the open source community will ensure that any decent software ideas continue to develop, regardless of hardware.
bring on the portable linux devices!
The very mention of Tomorrow's World depresses me - all those broken promises of a geothermal powered, pills-at-meal-times future. Bah.
Well, I had a Microwriter Agenda with a chorded keypad - very easy to use but had a habit of freezing up (all except the alarm that is - which kept ringing every hour even though I couldn't turn the darn' thing off anymore - it's still under a duvet in my wardrobe) - the company went bust.
Psion 3a followed - probably the best of the range - small, nice keyboard - Psion 5 after a Swedish guy accidentally knocked the 3a off of my desk - dodgy hinge mechanism which was common to the model and, combined with Palm's better Outlook sync (Psion was always rubbish at that) marked the downfall of Psion in the PDA market.
Funnily enough last-year Psion was roundly ridiculed for the Foleo - a low-powered sub-notebook affair; they dropped it, and now the Asus Eeepc and Nokia N800 are quite popular and they're low-powered sub-notebooks! Poor old Psion.
Completely agree with Alison re: Acorn RISC PC Mk2.
Amazing technology for the time, just a shame Acorn closed the worksation division down.
Those of us around when micros first hit the public arena will remember the buzz surrounding a program called 'The Last One'. This was a program that was supposed to produce programs without the need for programming. It was a big topic for around a year before it disappeared.
Alex - data storage in cubes is an active area of research, known as holographic data storage. And the theory is that these devices could hold a terabyte or more of data in a cube the size of a sugarcube. Disk versions of this technology were made commercially available last year by InPhase Technology.
Was Tomorrow's World really making an April fool, or displaying remarkable prescience?
\begin{rant}
I think the market is different today, a decade or more ago no one knew what format / product types would be popular. In terms of PDA's the most import (in my view) product must be the Apple Newton, although a commercial failure, it paved the way for the cheaper Palm Pilot those design is the template of almost all modern PDA's. Psion where great though, I loved the Series 3, but at that point (rather than building the series 5) they needed a big leap, and in the end they got over taken by Palm.
In my view all mobile technology is a battle between size and functionality. For example the recent success of the Asus Eee PC is in large part due to the fact it is a fully functional at the bare minimum size to retain usability.
I read the article vis Bill Gate's interview on the Beeb a few weeks back, and I feel (like the table he demonstrated) there will be quiet a few new "quirky" devises to make it to prototype stage using lots of different HCI's. We computer scientists hunting away for a more elegant method of communicating with our machines (though IMO the keyboard will be main method until well after I'm no longer here)
I've not seen to many computing devices fail (bar the frequent efforts for VR products). Which goes to show, at the end of the day, computers are about the inside, our interface with them is a trivial matter (though probably mastered best by Apple).
One general, rather than product specific, idea I've never seen really work is that of Neural Networks and parallel processing attempts to reconstruct a computer that works like we do. I'm sure lots of us have (at some point) been lectured on how they would be "the future", doesn't really seemed to have panned out like that.
\end{rant}
It may be too early to call this a technology that never happened but I don't know of anything that has moved with it for a long time:
The saddest thing is that there are so many ideas that must have been thought of but never even came far enough for us to remember them not happening (Kinetic chargers built into mobile phones anyone?)
\begin{rant}
I think the market is different today, a decade or more ago no one knew what format / product types would be popular. In terms of PDA's the most import (in my view) product must be the Apple Newton, although a commercial failure, it paved the way for the cheaper Palm Pilot those design is the template of almost all modern PDA's. Psion where great though, I loved the Series 3, but at that point (rather than building the series 5) they needed a big leap, and in the end they got over taken by Palm.
In my view all mobile technology is a battle between size and functionality. For example the recent success of the Asus Eee PC is in large part due to the fact it is a fully functional at the bare minimum size to retain usability.
I read the article vis Bill Gate's interview on the Beeb a few weeks back, and I feel (like the table he demonstrated) there will be quiet a few new "quirky" devises to make it to prototype stage using lots of different HCI's. We computer scientists hunting away for a more elegant method of communicating with our machines (though IMO the keyboard will be main method until well after I'm no longer here)
I've not seen to many computing devices fail (bar the frequent efforts for VR products). Which goes to show, at the end of the day, computers are about the inside, our interface with them is a trivial matter (though probably mastered best by Apple).
One general, rather than product specific, idea I've never seen really work is that of Neural Networks and parallel processing attempts to reconstruct a computer that works like we do. I'm sure lots of us have (at some point) been lectured on how they would be "the future", doesn't really seemed to have panned out like that.
\end{rant}
I am still waiting for a "Smart Phone" that is as useful as a Psion was, and is as easy to use as my series 3.
Why do manufactures seem to be obsessed with features, and shine, rather than usability?
There have been a number of occaisions where people come forward and predict that the future of computing lies in a distributed model where we rent all of our software for use from some centralised system. Larry Ellison of Oracle fame was a leading proponent of this, repeatedly informing us of his hatred the PC and how the future lay with servers (probably because this coincided with the systems he provided)
I remember the Nintendo 'Virtual Boy'. That was a truly innovative concept back in the day with it's red and black only screen! I remember seeing previews for it in nintendo magazines, and then it disappeared!
The 3DO games console - which sank without trace due to mistiming (the Playstation was released shortly after its hit the market and a very high console price of 拢400) - had a much anticipated successor called the M2.
This was supposed to usher in a new era of gaming but Panasonic sold the rights to Matsushita for $100 million who then shelved it. A few M2 prototypes do exist and fetch very high prices although the software is limited to 4 game titles. The technology appeared in a Business multimedia system and a coffee machine!
to parsnip:
sadly mobile linux devices are not the cure-all.
I've got an Archos 404 mp3 player, a beautiful wee machine, which is essentially a linux pc.
Archos have locked down the hardware as hard as they can. Although the source may be open, you can't install any of your own - or anyone else's - software on the hardware.
It does an excellent job of what it's supposed to, but it could have been so much better with more input from the community.
The deal between Sony and Nintendo that would have created the "Play Station" console (note the space) collapsed because it would have given Sony rights over Nintendo intellectual property (i.e. Mario, Zelda etc) that was released on CD format.
Linux/Open source taking over the software world, been waiting over 10 years for that. Not that the champions of it will ever let anyone state anything but it being the best thing ever. Shame most of the champions seem unable to grasp that no developer is going to work for free, unless he's got another form of income. The developers that do work for free are ones that will soon leave for paid jobs if they are any good at what they do. Firefox developers and Linus Torvalds continue to 100% Pro bono publico dont they? I don't believe any of them have used their public image to gain any form of numeration.
I was a bit too young to remember 'The Last One'. My years at school was sitting in front of a 大象传媒 Micro or Acorn. But it sounds to me like the Last One is the holy grail that Object Oriented Programming (OOP) is trying to achieve. Still can't get my head around OOPs Classes.
Re #2,#5: the cube was quite genuine. It was composed of bacteriorhodopsin (a bacterial-derived gel) and used several lasers together to read or write data stored in its three dimensional lattice. If you click on the URL link in my name (above), you'll find an article about it.
The promise was of an ultra-high-density storage, orders of magnitude higher than even today's offerings.
Does anyone remember the 'Microwriter' - an interesting little hand held tool aimed at replacing the QWERTY keyboard that was activated by pressure pads pressed down in various sequences by the fingers of one hand - claimed to get started in 1/2 hour so the manufacturer attended several PC World shows demonstrating and introducing it to the delegates.
Nice idea but a hard sell I'd imagine?
It wasnt Tomorrows World, it was Going Live. Philip Schofield offered the music player as a prize on the 1st of April 1989 (GL ran from 87-92, 89 is the only Saturday 01/04) to the person who could answer a question along the lines of 'What else is Gowky Day known as?'. A gowk is a fool ...
I remember this because they got me good and proper. They got me so well that the ipod has never impressed me.
I work on IT projects, most laymen expect to talk to the darn things like Kirk/Pichard, therefore the most undelivered piece of hw/sw is the USS Enterprise IMHO. I have nicknamed this the Star Trek Effect - 'The over high expectation of IT functionality in IT projects due to the laymans mind having been warped by episodes of Star Trek'. This effect leads to the failure of IT Projects because the customer demands too much from the supplier, and then wastes more time arguing that they want it even though its a Would on the MoSCoW list.
Hi,
Well all these memories!
I had Psion's (3a and 5) and an Apple Newton, all of them were brilliant and showed what PDAs should be like. Was really dissapointed by their withdrawal from the markets.
Now I have a Windows Mobile, which though useful is not as flexible as what I had before. I also use a Samsung F700 (iPhone wannabe) which I can't quite configure to do much with email or calendars!!
And I did used to work for a little company called Creative Labs who produced a PC version of the 3DO machine, games were great - shame to see that shelved!
I have also had a range of games machines that never really took off - I think LYNX was one of them, Amiga CD-32 was another, CD-i...
Think the moral of the story here is - if I buy it, it wont be around for much longer... :(
All this talk makes me miss Tomorrow's World. What a great show it was in hindsight. In 20 years time, which of today's programmes will we be fondly (in some cases) reminiscing about? None, I suspect. You would think, given the omnipresence of all things technical there would be a place for a semi-serious science/technology show on TV (no, not The Gadget Show, thanks).
Well ChrisC what about the 大象传媒 Show Click is that not a technology show :P?