Taking on iTunes
- 5 Mar 08, 20:39 GMT
Could a tiny business based in London's Shoreditch take a bite out of Apple’s digital music empire? It seems unlikely and even 7digital will admit that it’s a David facing a Goliath. But this week’s could at least make Apple sit up and take notice.
The seamless integration between the iPod and iTunes – and the manner in which the Apple ecosystem makes rival devices and services less useful to music fans – has made Steve Jobs the most powerful figure in digital music, with Apple commanding around 80% of the market. The big four labels – who saw iTunes as a saviour when it arrived promising users a viable alternative to pirated tracks – are now chafing at the bit.
They don’t like Apple’s insistence on a single price for tracks and albums, and they’re waking up to the fact that they’ve handed the retail end of their digital business to one player.
So Warner is striking a blow for the whole industry by offering its catalogue DRM-free and in MP3 format to 7digital. Until now, it has made perfect sense for iPod users to stick with iTunes - tracks downloaded from other services just wouldn’t play because of their incompatible DRM. Now 7digital’s MP3s will play on an iPod – as well as on other music-players and on mobile phones.
In other words, you are buying a more flexible product – and to make it more attractive 7digital has cut the price of 158 albums to £5, as compared with the £7.99 you will pay on iTunes. I’d be surprised if that is anything but a short-term gimmick – though Ben Drury, the co-founder of 7digital told me it would carry on for some time.
Wandering around the compact offices 7digital occupies in Shoreditch it seems extraordinary that this is the headquarters of what claims to be one of the top three music download services in the UK. But that just goes to show how mighty Apple is compared to the rest, and how slowly the whole digital downloads industry has been growing. The likes of Napster, HMV, and Wippit have all struggled to make any kind of impact.
This little business with 28 staff may not be a major threat to iTunes - Steve Jobs is more likely to be worried about Amazon’s MP3 service, which is currently available only in the United States. But 7digital is part of a movement which is sweeping away DRM from music. Apple itself predicted that trend in Steve Jobs’ open letter to the music industry last year, and will be hoping that it too will benefit as paid-for downloads become as flexible as the pirated kind. But, at long last, competition is arriving in the digital music business bringing users the choice they deserve
This post is closed to new comments.
The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comments
It's good to see that DRM is slowly disappearing. Though not a entirely legal.. it's always been quite easy to copy music for _personal_ use off the old formats (cd, cassette .etc).
Computers are very good at reducing our civil liberties by preventing us from bending the rules even a little bit. It's nice to see more of a grey area appear.
We need to give users some responsibility or else the 'system' will be blamed, rather than individuals accepting their resposibilities - Whether the 'system' be social or electronic.
Neither will be a serious threat to iTunes as they're still only selling MP3. It's ancient & it's own standards body has superceded it twice.
I think most people have worked out that until someone comes up with a better unit than an iPod sticking with iTunes is no disadvantage & is still the smoothest & easiest solution.
McD
A fiver an album? Now, if that was the standard, that would be MUCH more like, and would make legal downloading a significantly more attractive option. The recent deals signed by last.fm and 7digital are very encouraging, and will hopefully make 2008 a key year for the digital music economy.
I've never used itunes once either to buy or listen to songs. There are far better mp3 players around then the ipod that can also run WMA files as well as mp3s.
The only download source I've used is e-music which isn't DRM protected anyway so I can't see this affecting me to much anyway as 7digital isn't gonna have the little known indie punk that I listen to on there
iTunes does not have just a single price for albums. If you look carefully on their shop, there are pages of albums for under £5, under £6 and under £7.
£5 an album is much better. The way i see it, if i'm paying £7.99 from itunes its more worth it to physically buy it for a similar price on the internet, say play.com or amazon.
Loving the DRM free thing but come on, the albums for the "sale" price (how long will that last?) of a fiver are well... old, very old and very limited. Also i find it quite funny that they think a team of 28 people is small? If they only knew how many people are working on iTunes, now thats a small team but a very good one from what i understand.
iTunes keep up the good work!
The problem most of these companies will be faced with is not competing at price, since Apple isn't going to move out of its way for a tiny share in the market, but instead getting their name accredited as a quality market and as a name amongst general populace.
1.3 million downloads (since founding I believe the interview stated) seems piddley in comparison to Apple’s hundreds of millions each year, and unless Apple slip up I cant see their customers making an active effort to make a move.
Apple does not use fixed prices - there are a number of Albums at prices other than £7.99 - Five pages full of Albums for under £5 the last time I looked.
The fixed price of 79p is perceived by Journos as a bad thing, as as user I love the simplicity of buying only the tracks I like at one simple and affordable price. I have dozens of CDs that I have bought only to find I like a handful of tracks. Only this morning I heard a song on the radio that reminded me of a time in my teens, five minutes later and after spending 79p the memory was mine.
Apple are very good at understanding what MOST people want. The iPod is a nice piece of kit, using it with iTunes is easy and their range and affordability of music is fantastic, until someone matches that, Apple will remain number 1.
Don't forget Nokia have also recently entered the fray.
I'd guess there are as many Nokia handsets around as there are ipods and itunes.
If I can play all my tunes on one device why would I evn bother with a gadget that only plays tunes?