The Scrabulous puzzle
- 28 Aug 08, 10:46 GMT
I promised the answers to the little Scrabble/Scrabulous puzzle I set earlier this week - and here it is. The six words were DELUDED, OBLOQUY, IDIOTIC, OPENING, UNHAPPY and CABBAGE, which I managed to fit on the board in the manner shown in the picture.
I reckon that adds up to a score of 162, plus 50 for getting all seven letters out first go, so 212. Someone called "dashing dave" was first to post the answers.
But most of you seemed more preoccupied with wading into an argument about ithe rights and wrongs of the affair. Some championed the right of the Agarwalla brothers - who created Scrabulous - to give Facebook users a better twist on Scrabble than its makers could provide. Others felt Mattel and Hasbro had a perfect right to battle to protect their intellectual property.
But in this war of words you seem to be voting with your feet, and that's bad news for the official Scrabble. The Agarwalla brothers have already launched a Facebook game called Wordscraper, which has a different board and circular tiles to get round the copyright problem. It has a quarter of a million users, as compared to the 71,000 now using the official worldwide version of Scrabble on Facebook - a figure which has actually fallen in the last few days.
And it looks as though more players, desperate for their fix, may be heading for the Scrabulous website and playing the game there. The result? Less traffic for Facebook - and the prospect of a new punch-up over intellectual property between the Agarwallas and Hasbro and Mattel. Now, who's got a seven-letter, high-scoring word for that?
The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comment number 1.
At 28th Aug 2008, Johnny Pixels wrote:JUSTICE?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 28th Aug 2008, Hamish Thompson wrote:lawyers
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 28th Aug 2008, hackerjack wrote:thieves
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 28th Aug 2008, Alexanderliam wrote:Lawsuit
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 28th Aug 2008, geeza wrote:Owngoal? OK, so not a valid word...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 29th Aug 2008, hackerjack wrote:I dont think anyone is denying that the unofficial product is far superior.
However copyright infringement is just that. They should have done it properly in the first place.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 30th Aug 2008, williamalake wrote:Regardless of opinion, what Scrabulous have done is contravene international treaties to which their country is a part of. It is only fair to assume that scrabble would want to protect their intellectual property rights.
Surely a better way would have been for the owners of scrabble to liaise with Scrabulous so that they can both share the popularity of an online version of an already hugely popular game? but that is neither their legal prerogative nor choice in this matter. They are fully within their rights to do what they have done, and one should question the ability of the law to handle such instances rather than Scrabble's intentions to apply the law in this given instance.
Also, we must remember that Scrabulous has broken the law and should have done liaised with Scrabble in the first instance. It was always up to them to instigate negotiations rather than the other way round.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)