Google's playground grows up
- 15 Jul 09, 09:57 GMT
For the last three years has been a playground for the company's engineers to float new ideas and see how users respond to them.
Everything about the project has been experimental with no promises made to users that any of these features would become permanent and enter the mainstream of the Gmail front page.
Gmail's product manager Keith Coleman told me:
"On launch day we had 12 things in labs and didn't really know if any of them would be popular or whether or not users would really use them.
"In the past we would have tested these features inside the company but Labs brought that to the rest of the world and let all users have input into which ideas are the best and which really work."
In Google speak this is called "". I prefer "people power".
Today there are 48 labs features and they range from letting you customise keyboard shortcuts to translating messages and from seeing your e-mail offline to getting alerts to tell you take a break from e-mail and step away from the computer.
While Keith said it's not a popularity contest, the users have spoken and "tasks" is the first lab project to graduate to the Gmail shop floor.
It can be found on the left hand side under contacts and is a nifty wee application that lets you keep a tab on everything from drinks with the girls to your shopping list to a visit to the dentist. I haven't had long to play with it, but now I have even less excuse for forgetting stuff.
Google have show off some of its capabilities.
Other features that look set to graduate include pictures in chat that shows the photograph of the person you are chatting to and something else called undo send, that I think might save a few blushes here and there. That functions allows you to basically unsend an e-mail.
At the same time Google has also announced that it is opening up product.
There are only a handful of offerings there but at first glance they seem pretty useful in helping organise ones life...and boy one needs it!
The world clock will be really useful for me working on the west coast eight hours behind my London bosses and three behind my Washington editors.
As Google looks more and more to cater to its enterprise customers, Calendar product manager Ken Norton told me that "the other interesting news is that Calendar Labs will come with a set of APIs for customers to add their own features that are important to them but not to the wider user."
He talked of one customer who wanted to be able to know when he books a conference room if that room had a microscope in it. Obviously not a vital piece of information for all users and as Ken said it's something Google wouldn't build so it said "here are a set of APIs so you can create a calendar for your own unique needs."
Naturally enough I quizzed both men on the fact that they were making their announcements at the same time as Microsoft was telling its partner conference in New Orleans about its new free .
While neither gent wanted to take that issue head on, Mr Norton pointed out that:
"The first thing that Labs speaks to is how quickly you can innovate in the cloud. In the desktop software world you have to ship updates.
"You can't put new features in front of users when you like. You are subject to the software distribution model. Our products were built in the cloud and we are always releasing new features to users on a rapid basis."
Last year I was one of a few journalists who were allowed inside the hallowed halls of the Gmail team to see what they were working on and hear the history of how the product came to pass.
The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comment number 1.
At 15th Jul 2009, jyotikajoe wrote:Good post
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 15th Jul 2009, G5airplane wrote:This is the kind of thing Google is very good at. IMO, they should focus more on this and less of making operating systems and the like.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 15th Jul 2009, richardwhiuk wrote:If Google make an operating system half as reliable and usable as their web based services, you won't find me complaining.
I don't use GMail much - mainly because I could never get it to pick up my other email accounts, but I do use the Calendar, so this is welcome news.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 15th Jul 2009, RB wrote:Minor quibble, but "dog fooding" is nothing to do with releasing features to customers, rather it is about making use of your own products. Having all Google employees use GMail would be an example. Getting external users to comment on new features at an early stage isn't.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 15th Jul 2009, U9746596 wrote:@G5airplane
Do you mean that google aren't very good at making operating systems, or that we already have way to many companies making high quality operating systems that the market is over saturated that they shouldn't bother?
I would disagree with both...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 15th Jul 2009, SpoilingMyBallotPaper wrote:I didn't use "Tasks" when it was at the Labs stage and I don't want to use it now. But there it is, cluttering up my screen. At least give users the opportunity to turn it off if they don't want it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 15th Jul 2009, dnrothwell wrote:"dog fooding" is yet another oblique reference to Microsoft, who for many years have been describing the way their internal staff use their own products as "eating our own cat food"
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 16th Jul 2009, Briantist wrote:@G5airplane If that an analysis or an opinion? Please show your working.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 16th Jul 2009, G5airplane wrote:5 and 8: that's just my opinion, which is why I said "IMO"
I think there are enough netbook OSes and certainly enough Linux distros, the world dosen't really need any more.
Again, that's only my opinion.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 16th Jul 2009, U9746596 wrote:I understand it's only your opinion but all of those Linux distributions are only making up 4% of the market. Surely google have got good reason to at least have a go and try and bring down the old dinosaur.
Plus there really isn't anything around that is doing what they are looking at doing with Chrome OS..
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 16th Jul 2009, LiveforPool wrote:G5 - also have to disagree with your opinion. With all respect to Linux OSs, they're unlikely to pose a real threat to MS. Google however are a massive name with consumer trust and have the potential to disrupt MSs monopoly. I dont mean to sound anti MS, they've built a sound product for many years, but with added competition, IMO, MS will have to do more whilst Google will be offering an (judging by their success to date) attractive alternative.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 16th Jul 2009, G5airplane wrote:10 and 11 - I agree to a certain point, and like I said in another article, Chrome OS will do well just because of the Google brand.
However, it's a OS aimed at netbooks, and I think a slightly modified Android would be more suited to that purpose. If Google wants to do a OS, they need to spend time on a OS for desktop computers and normal laptops. They have a much larger market anyway.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 17th Jul 2009, fivegoldstars wrote:I think that the 'playground' reference is very telling - a corporation as big as Google, with the revenues it pulls in, can afford to let it's employees have time to create and innovate...almost in a child-like fashion. If a new feature doesn't pay off, it's not the end of the world. Unfortunately, most start-ups, no matter how great their original idea, don't have this luxury, having to explain every minute of staff time to lenders/shareholders. Such a rigid environment stifles creativity with the ironic end result that the money men never get an astronomical return, if any at all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)