A lofty ivory tower?
| 12:22 UK time, Friday, 20 October 2006
Beware of the wisdom of crowds - or the man in the pub. Some of the cautionary phrases used by ´óÏó´«Ã½ folk at an internal audience seminar chaired by the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s head of news Helen Boaden. I was on the panel along with the editor of the Guardian, our political editor Nick Robinson and world news editor Jon Williams (you can read Jon's thoughts on the matter below this post, or by clicking here).
So where do we stand on the issue of how much to listen to our audiences - how much say we give them about story selection and running orders?. How much do we impose and how much do we interact?
Enter Sarah - a 21 year old listener to Radio 1 who gave me some good advice when we met up recently: "No matter how high up in the news you are, at the ´óÏó´«Ã½ or whatever, you've got to listen to us, we pay the licence fee... without us you'd be nothing". She's dead right and we ignore audiences today at our extreme peril.
It's not just a lip service thing though, it genuinely makes us editorially richer I believe - serving a young Radio 1 audience who love texting - the moment we stop reading their incoming texts on the stories of the day is the moment I lose touch with the people who make us tick - our 9.3 million listeners.
It's made our news agenda stronger and faster: We were alerted to stories like the dangers of "Snatch" landrovers in Iraq and Afghanistan by our listeners with military connections long before our other ´óÏó´«Ã½ network colleagues. And we were better able to gauge listener anger over Norwich Union's decision not to "quote happy" younger drivers on their insurance as well as current street issues on drugs, drink and sex.
It may not be right for all ´óÏó´«Ã½ outlets - and journalists still have an important role in checking out the facts and binning the hoaxes as well as sifting and editing the vast range of ideas, info and tips that come flooding in. But why should we be in charge in a lofty ivory tower? If you've got a better idea for a story - a lead - an investigation - just shout.
I am clear where we stand. Without our audience and our daily dialogue with them - we'd be finished.
Comments
I recently visited ´óÏó´«Ã½ site after a while, a considerable time. I was amazed how you have lost so much of your impartiality and depth on world affairs. Example of a correspondence like Harrison is a poor sub. for Dimbleby, or was it Dimbelby.
"Beware of the wisdom of crowds-or the man in the pub." In other words don't use the logic of mob psychology such as in a race riot or a lynch mob or the prattlings of drunks as authoritative sources for your news reports. Wow, ´óÏó´«Ã½'s so called "College of Journalism" doesn't waste time on the basic stuff, it goes right to the advanced topics straight away. Now I see how your reporters are educated and given perspective to achieve the qualities they routinely display.
I am afraid ´óÏó´«Ã½ actually IS a lofty ivory tower. You are extremely multicultural and you can't stand other viewpoints as you consider them either 'insensitive' or 'extreme'. But it doesn't prevent you to present and promote violent ideologies like violent Islam and at the same time defame Christianity claiming you have the right to do so. Such attitude is nothing more than a hypocrisy.
To often you don't say what is need to be said and say something what is simply unreasonable but in line with PC policy.
Extreme multiculturalism like all extremes don't serve anybody's interest so it is time ´óÏó´«Ã½ reconsider its policy and implement some changes.
Fortunately you acknowledged that you are biased But ultra multiculturalism is deep inside BCC and correcting it may take much time, assuming the ´óÏó´«Ã½ wants to improve in the first place.
Very nice keep it up
Are you happy with the mob psychology of an audience, jury, or electorate?
What were the action points from the seminar?