Out to launch
There are few sights as evocative of Clyde heritage as a ship launch. But it's a sight you may only be able to see twice more.
When a patrol vessel descended the slipway from the Scotstoun yard on Thursday, bound for Trinidad and Tobago, it was the third last launch planned by the oft-rebranded company we are now to call BAE Systems Surface Ships.
The Scarborough - named after the main township on Tobago rather than the Yorkshire seaside resort - is one of three patrol vessels intended more for intercepting drug smugglers and humanitarian support than force projection through the Caribbean.
It's even designed as the platform for a refrigerated mortuary in case of hurricane relief.
There's one further Trinidadian patrol ship to be finished on the Clyde, and in late summer next year, there will be the sixth and final Type 45 Destroyer to launch at Govan.
For years after that, the only work is likely to be large chunks of the Royal Navy's super-carriers, which will be floated down the Clyde and assembled at Rosyth in Fife.
And then there's the Future Surface Combatant class of ship to follow after that. The intention is not to launch them at all, but to build them either in dry dock or on barges for submersion when the ship is ready.
I hear the excitement, hoopla and drama of seeing a vast ship descending a slipway will soon be outweighed by the risk that it goes horribly wrong and wallops the opposite bank.
Scotland's defence jobs
- While on the shipyard theme, one piece of research published by Fraser of Allander Institute this week - in addition to its downbeat assessment of Scotland's recovery prospects - was work on the number of defence jobs in Scotland.
- Its conclusion: it's not easy to tell, and if Scotland is to make rational choices about its future defence posture, in or out of the United Kingdom, it needs better information.
- It cites analysis for the UK Government showing Scottish military employment had fallen from 19,300 to 12,400 between 1990 and 2007, with civilian employment down by more than a third, from 10,300 to 6500.
- That's less than its population share of both uniformed personnel and civilians. And it's heavily biased towards Moray, with its two air bases and Argyll, which includes the Faslane submarine base. Each has around 3,000 service personnel. Edinburgh and Fife have roughly half as many.
- In 2006, the defence industry employed 7,300 in shipbuilding, and 4,500 in aerospace.
- The supercarrier contract, which represents a large part of the workload in the next six years, would be very expensive to cancel, even in the face of draconian government spending cuts. Around £1bn is already committed.
- But other "difficult choices on defence" are looming, writes Strathclyde University economist Stewart Dunlop.
- "Given that these choices will ultimately be made by voters, it would clearly assist the public if the political parties would spell out in more detail both what they believe are realistic options and the consequences of these. Neither of these situations seems likely to improve in the near future, but until we have this information, we are making decisions in the dark."
Comment number 1.
At 21st Nov 2009, euroscot wrote:Choices on defence?
Security, and how best to pay for it, is a work in progress.
The Nato defence alliance is writing a strategic concept for the 21st century, which will undoubtedly influence thinking on the military within Europe. A former security advisor to the US presidency favours a global security web, and suggests that the West's Nato [regional defence alliances are permitted by the UN Charter] should link up eventually with Central Asia's CSTO and the East's Shanghai Cooperation Organisation; however he suggests this web would be outwith the control of the United Nations.
Paying for security? Unfortunately Britain is ceding the opportunity to have significant input to economic decisions in the European Union.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 21st Nov 2009, Barry Watson wrote:Ah Douglas. I bet you a Carmel Wafer that there will be more dynamic launches on the Clyde. Govan is the most cost effective yard to build hulls in the UK and no yard beats Scotstoun for outfitting warships. If the Tories keep their noses out of BAE's business then the FSC's will come to the Clyde. Plus watch out for more work being switched from Portsmouth to the Clyde.
Look our for the blindman hard at work over the next month.
Try
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 21st Nov 2009, euroscot wrote:How might Scotland be affected in this crucial public service? Perhaps not too badly.
More background. The US security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wants the alliance's S-G to rewrite Articles 5 and 13 of Nato's charter. At present members have agreed that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all; and consequently a member shall take such action as it deems necessary to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
ZB thinks the discretion should be removed. In addition he suggests that members should be thrown out of the alliance if they fail to meet their obligations or allow their military to fall below an adequate level.
"Over the past decade, the average non-US NATO member defence budget was approximately 1.4% of GDP. This is in direct contravention of a pledge made by NATO defence ministers in 2002 (and repeated again in 2006) to spend a minimum of 2% of GDP per annum on defence."
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)