Reality Check: Prison Pressures
There's popular support for locking up those found guilty of knife crime. That's particularly in west central Scotland, where chib culture has an unusually strong grip on young men.
Both Labour and Tories back versions of that policy, with at least six month mandatory sentences.
There's also popular support for ending the automatic, unconditional early release - at the half-way point in their sentence - of prisoners serving less than four years.
The four main parties in the Scottish election are agreed on that much, despite the fact that all four of them have, at different times, operated the policy while in government and in charge of the justice system over the past 18 years.
Then there's a move to bring back the handing down of short prison sentences. Labour and Conservatives favour that, while SNP and LibDems want more non-custodial sentencing for less serious crimes.
Three policies. All quite popular in their own way. Not much evidence that they have a deterrent effect. And rather expensive.
Over-crowding
As part of ´óÏó´«Ã½ Scotland's reality check on election issues, I've been looking at the figures on this.
Let's start with the state of prisons now. With a bit of rounding off, the prison population has risen from just over 6,000 ten years ago to 8,000 now. The crime rate has been falling, for a number of reasons, but some more serious crimes are on the rise, and average sentences have been getting longer. The expectation is that the prison population will continue to rise, without any policy changes being made.
That puts pressure on prisons. There's currently design capacity for around 7,300 inmates. The new Low Moss prison in East Dunbartonshire is due to open next year, taking that up to 8,000 - by which time the prison population will probably be north of that figure. So there's over-crowding already.
Meanwhile, resources are tight, to say the least. In the new financial year, the Scottish Prison Service is taking a 24% budget cut, much of that in its capital budget, which is down 66%.
That's one of the biggest cuts of any Holyrood budget, and provides a tough financial context for all these sentencing policies.
Deterrent effect
The official reckoning on the impact of ending automatic early release of prisoners is that it would require between 700 and 1,100 places. That explains why the legislation was passed back in 2006 to reverse the policy, but it's never been implemented.
The cost of jailing everyone convicted of knife crime is quite a bit more. Official statistics show those convicted in the most recent annual figures stood at 3898, which was a significant fall on previous years.
Roughly a third of those convicted already go to jail. So if you're going to jail the others for an average of six months, that's around another 1,300 prison places required.
Supporters of the policy suggest there could be much more rounding down once you take account of the deterrent effect - that is, the fear of prison will keep people from carrying knives.
But senior police officers say that deterrent doesn't work, and we've heard from other experts in the field who agree. Even the experience of being in jail or young offenders institution doesn't seem much of a deterrent, given that well over half go on to re-offend within two years.
Incarceration
So let's put that together. There's no spare capacity in prisons, and budgets are being sharply cut.
Between an end to automatic early release and the start to automatic jail terms for those carrying knives, it looks like 2,200 extra places.
There's a new prison planned in Grampian to replace Peterhead and Aberdeen jails. Although there's no money available for it - or any other replacements of older prisons, including Inverness - HMP Grampian's budget is at least £100m for 550 places.
If that's the going rate for building prisons, the bill for these policies looks like a capital cost of around £400m. That's before running costs, when the price of incarceration runs at more than £30,000 per head per year.
That's before you calculate the cost of reinstating short sentences, as it's hard to guage how that might work and how extensively it would be applied by courts.
Even without that element, it doesn't look like the manifesto pledges being made on crime will be possible to deliver when budgets are so tight.
Comment number 1.
At 12th Apr 2011, Wee-Scamp wrote:No.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 13th Apr 2011, reincarnation wrote:The trouble with one party adopting unrealistic populist policies supported by the tabloids, is that it forces everyone onto the same ground.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Apr 2011, tenswen_dnaltocs wrote:This comment has been referred for further consideration. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 13th Apr 2011, StationX wrote:This comment has been referred for further consideration. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 13th Apr 2011, spagan wrote:Douglas
Perhaps Andy Kerr and New Labour plan more PFI "deals"?
Gordon Brown managed to wreck the UK's economy by puting everything on the UK Credit Card - and it is apparent that New Labour have still not learned the lesson.
The only Party with a consistent and effective policy on reducing Crime appears to be the SNP.
I'm confident that you agree!
Slainte Mhor
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 13th Apr 2011, redrobb wrote:Build more prisons! And what's wrong with SMART policing aka BEAT BOBBIES. Have you ever wondered why the unemployment figures have been dropping in Scotland, guess what, they don't count inmates....I regulary pay top dollar for slopping out whilst on holiday each morning, alas no compensation that's what caravanning is all about but hey-ho its against an inmates human rights LOL......
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 13th Apr 2011, fairforfochen wrote:You must be wrong. Both A.Kerr and Iain Gray {he who has walked the killing fields} say this is possible and who would argue with someone who has shown such judgement that they are unable to realise you cannot have discretion when sentences would be mandatory, and that, according to Andy is for crossing the threshold with a knife Not even for being convicted Look out the pipe band
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)