Art world missing Ai Weiwei
Something registered in the head of the tall Chinaman with a wispy beard and inscrutable stare when I introduced myself. It was impossible to tell what exactly, but I don't think it was positive.
Maybe it was my informal greeting, which consisted of a couple of friendly pats on his generous stomach followed up with "So, where's the Harley, big boy?" Or perhaps he was disappointed I hadn't joined him for breakfast. Of course, I might have been being overly sensitive. Whatever, suffice it to say that Ai Weiwei was not effusive when we first met last autumn.
Things got better after that awkward start. He likes Marcel Duchamp and so do I. That was enough. We spent a day together , during which time we talked about everything from marriage to moguls. I was looking forward to seeing him again today at the . But of course I won't, because he has vanished, having been thirty-eight days ago. There has been no word from him since.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
And for a man who likes to tweet, blog and take photographs pretty much constantly, that is a bad sign. It makes his show at the all the more poignant. His brightly coloured vases look like eager children waiting for their dad to come home. The empty chairs and marble CCTV camera on the other side of the gallery suggest they could be in for a long wait. The empty coffin is chilling.
Nobody knows what he has done wrong beyond what the Chinese have called "economic crimes". Nobody knows where he is and when he might be released. Friends, supporters and fellow artists are becoming increasingly worried. All this at a time when many of the world's leading museums and galleries are strengthening their ties with the Chinese authorities; arranging exhibitions, sharing expertise. Will they now cut those ties, or at least loosen them?
Ai Weiwei is a significant man. He demands respect through the force of his personality and intellect. Like many powerful people he talks very quietly. Why should he speak up? If you want to hear him then lean forward and listen. He makes few concessions.
His entourage (not a big one, but an entourage all the same) tends to encircle him, partly to protect, partly to be close. But when he is being interviewed they melt away into the background. Except for a young American documentary filmmaker who has been Ai Weiwei's constant companion for many months, recording his life in minute detail. She is always nearby, even when he is being interviewed, there she is, three feet away documenting everything that is said.
Which in Ai Weiwei's case is often direct and honest. He told me that the famous series of photographs he took of himself dropping an ancient Chinese vase was intended as a joke, not an artwork. And the only reason they came to be considered a work of art was out of necessity. He desperately needed to find some work for a solo exhibition and he didn't have very much knocking about at the time. So, he fished out the photographs and offered them as something of a filler. Today the photographs are one of his most celebrated creations.
He told the story with a broad smile, which is not a face he pulls that often. It wasn't a smug or cynical smile, but one of faint bemusement: the smile of a creator who accepts that others are sometimes better at judging an artist's work. Very Duchampian.
His manner changes when he talks about China and politics. He gathers himself physically, his eyes narrow, his stare becomes more intense. He speaks even more quietly. And he refers to himself in the third person, suggesting his approach to political change is replicable - perhaps even a manifesto. He told me that one Ai Weiwei can't change things but if there were 100, maybe 1000s, then the government would have to listen.
Well, today there is no Ai Weiwei, he has disappeared - all is eerily quiet.
Comment number 1.
At 11th May 2011, Nickmcn wrote:I think it's very sad that the art institutions are not already backing away from their commitments to China. Whilst we can expect business and governments to take a less principled view due to their specific motivations the art and cultural world should use this opportunity to show why we all need what they have to offer and stand up for what is a horrible act of cowardice and fear of openess by the inner clique of China's ruling party.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 11th May 2011, Odicean wrote:It really is appalling that Weiwei grabs all the media attention when he is arrested just because he is a talented artist. There are plenty of other Chinese citizens being arrested just as suddenly as Weiwei every day, but does the media pay any attention to them? No. It's almost as if Hugh Laurie had been arrested.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 11th May 2011, synthjock wrote:'Inscrutable'? Seriously?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 11th May 2011, CASTELLAN wrote:A tree that does not bend with the wind breaks and the little dog laughed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 11th May 2011, Mishmash wrote:As synthjock pointed out - the laziest of stereotypes - and the patting on the stomach? I think I would have responded with a friendly punch to the face. These things spoil an otherwise mediocre article.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 11th May 2011, SheffTim wrote:"Maybe it was my informal greeting, which consisted of a couple of friendly pats on his generous stomach followed up with "So, where's the Harley, big boy?"
That's how you greet strangers? Let alone respected artists! Your lucky he deigned to give you any interview after that; I'd have backed off from you as fast as I could.
To more important matters; Ai Weiwei's disappearance, following the bulldozing of his studio is ominous; the silence of world leaders about this is shameful.
The world needs to wake up and see Weiwei as another Solzhenitsyn or Mandela.
Say nothing, do nothing and Ai Weiwei will disappear into China's gulag of interrogation centres and prisons - his voice silenced; his talents, if not his life, murdered.
Liu Xiaobo (founder of Charter 08 for democracy) has been imprisoned, Ai Weiwei now 'disappeared'. How many other Chinese dissidents have just vanished?
Does China's economic clout now mean they can dispose of any political dissenters with impunity?
Speak out, keep Ai Weiwei and Liu Xiaobo's names alive. Speak on their behalf; keep the issue and their names in the public eye.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 12th May 2011, qyoungson wrote:SheffTim
Stranger? Didn't Will Gompertz used to be a director at the Tate Gallery? I would hardly imagine he is considered a stranger to many artists - just comment-trolls.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 12th May 2011, jonathanbw wrote:It's 2011; the Arts Editor at the ´óÏó´«Ã½ describes a Chinese man as 'inscrutable'.
Is this a post-post-modern assault on 'political correctness' or just lazy journalism of the kind that suggests the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust needs to conduct another expensive and ineffectual 'review' whilst the rest of us despair at the irreversible decline of an institution that was once the envy of the world?
Just asking, like.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 13th May 2011, Baz wrote:I've double checked the meaning of 'inscrutable': "incapable of being investigated, analyzed, or scrutinized; impenetrable". Just what is the problem with its use in this context?
I'm bemused by some of the comments on this site - are people just unhappy in general and want to shout out loud?
Back to the matter in hand. Ai Weiwei has been disappeared. Is it purely down to art institutions... to back away from their commitments to China, or must we all consider what our role may be in this? There can't be many people in the UK who don't buy Chinese made goods every day, so are all feeding into this situation in one way or another.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)