大象传媒

This story appears courtesy of and with thanks to Robert H Allison.

And so after successfully completing both the ground school and the five stages of flying, we boarded a train for an over night ride from Ottumwa, Iowa to Pensacola, Florida. The pullman we were assigned to had one less bunk than the number of cadets assigned to it. The odd guy without a bunk turned out to be John August Munson, a CPT/WTS student who had been at Morningside college in Sioux City with my brother, Carl. He and his buddy, Gene Rife, another guy from Sioux City, had managed to get to the train last and Munson didn't get a bunk. So wouldn't you know since I had the lower bunk and Rife an upper, Munson piled in with me. In those days homosexuality wasn't on everybody's mind and no one thought any thing of two men sleeping in the same bunk. Not so today!

The required postcard home Our destination in Pensacola was the Pensacola Naval Air Station, the "Annapolis of the Air". This is one of the two final squadrons, the other being Corpus Christi Naval Air Station, where half the Navy cadets who have completed primary schools around the United States, and even some cadets from foreign countries, come for the final stages of their training before becoming full fledged Naval Aviators, presented their "Wings of Gold" and are commissioned as Ensigns in the United States Navy by proclamation of the Congress of the United States of America. To me and to everyone else it was no small honor. This I assure you!

Once we were checked into NAS Pensacola we were assigned to one of two out lying stations for basic training. These stations were Sauffley field and Ellison field, both named after early naval aviation heroes. I drew Ellison. It was the usual half-day ground school and half-day flying.

The planes we would be flying were the PT- 19, Vultee Valient or the Vultee Vibrator as the cadets called it. In the Navy it was known as the SNV. It was an all-metal, low-winged monoplane, considerably heavier than the Stearman with a little more horsepower. It, too, was a two seat, in tandem plane with a radio in place of the "gosport" arrangement in the Stearman. One stipulation on the plane was that, as far as the Navy was concerned, it was not constructed for acrobatics and as far as stunts were concerned---no dice. The Army Air Corps had no such restrictions.

Basic training was a short course designed to make a transition from the Stearman to a more combat like plane, the SNV. Here again the SNV was not a hard plane to fly but that didn't stop me from getting into trouble. My first "faux pas" occurred when I was taxiing out to the end of the runway with my instructor and another cadet for a three-plane formation take-off. During the taxi out the pilot has to lower the flaps. This requires twenty-eight turns of the flap crank. I was in the process of cranking when I had to throttle back to keep from over running the plane ahead.

Beings you use the same hand for cranking and jockeying the throttle, I paused in the cranking after 14 turns of the 28 necessary. When I continued cranking I cranked 14 turns in the opposite direction, hence, no flaps, a situation I was unaware of. On the run down the runway the wingmen are suppose to lift off before the flight leader, in this case the instructor. We were rolling along at what seemed to a very low speed. I couldn't lift the plane off the runway. All of a sudden the instructor poured the juice to his plane and I did the same. We left the other plane dragging way behind. Once we were in the air the instructor gave a hand signal that my flaps were up. I instantly knew that was the reason my plane was heavy. It doesn't require nearly as much air speed to raise a plane with flaps as it does without. The instructor was rather understanding about my explanation of counting. I didn't find that my error was necessarily a dangerous one in that the take-off was accomplished without any difficulty even though we had used up a good portion of the runway before the instructor looked back and saw my predicament. I was rather amused when a few days later I was reading the Pensacola paper and saw a picture of Ted William's, the Boston Red Sox baseball player, and read how he narrowly missed death when he took off in his SNV with the flaps up. A newspaper will print anything for news. Not only was the story "bullshit", but in the picture "ole" Ted had the epaulets on his dress white uniform snapped on upside-down. Not only did I read it, but someone else pinned the picture to the bulletin board in the barracks.

I'm not saying that is the only error I made. On one of my check rides I was to make practice landings. The instructor, whose name I believe was Lt. (jg) Weiss, told me to make the approach at 90 knots. My air speed ran between 85 and 95 knots. I couldn't control the speed because of the rough air. Maybe it was because of the rough air and maybe not. Anyway, the "ass" flew into a rage because of my lack of "ability". Berated me up one side and down the other side, told me I was too dumb to be a Navy flier and gave me a "down". I would gladly have killed the "Son of a Bi**h" on the spot.

Once we were back on the field I met with my instructor and was so depressed that I made the mistake of saying that I might as well quit! Something that influenced a rash statement like this was the fact that an order came out stating that any cadet who remained in the program after the 3rd of September would no longer be able to resign from the Navy but would go directly Great Lakes Training Station as a seaman second class. Those who desired not to accept this would be released from the program and returned to civilian life as of this date. The third of September just happened to be the next day. The instructor said "I wish you hadn't said that, I would have given you extra time, but now I would hold myself responsible if anything happened to you. But, if you wish, I will try to get you board time". Now I was in a predicament, do I go or do I stay. At any other time there would be no question, I could take the board time and if I failed I could get out. But not now, that evening I had a pocket full of quarters, puzzling over whether I should make the call home telling them I was a quitter. Well, I never made the call, the instructor got me the board time and I never looked back. What piss-poor timing! I have never forgiven that horse's ass Weiss.

From basic all cadets went to Whiting field, another out-lying field, for instrument training. It was a relatively short course for learning to fly on instruments and to study navigation including celestial navigation. Flying a plane under a hood makes you blind to the outside world and you are forced to control the plane on instruments. Don't know how well I did with the blind flying but I didn't crash and I did pass the check. I must have learned something for I was called upon to use these techniques many times later on.

One of the two other things I remember about NAS Whiting was sitting in a classroom with the only other fellow American cadet by the name of Allen. He was the other cadet in the three-plane take-off at NAS Ellison who was left on the runway. Also in the class were 18 Sub-Lieutenants of the British Royal Navy who were here for the same reason as the USA cadets-to learn to fly. Sitting in the classroom with my mind somewhere on "cloud nine" the instructor suddenly asked me " What is the most dangerous situation you can get into in an airplane?" Not having really heard the question, I was stumbling over the question and the answer when I heard one of the Sub-lieutenants whisper "a flat spin." I repeated the whispered answer to the instructor and again escaped by the skin of my teeth. Since that time I have a warm place in my heart for the Royal Navy. A few years later as I was reminiscing about the past, I began to wonder why I didn't know and why I should have had any reason to be embarrassed because I was not familiar with the term "flat spin". To the best of my knowledge I had never heard of the term and it had not been a term used in courses of flying or ground school, either in lectures or in textbooks. As for textbooks, I think I'm safe in saying that I was never issued a textbook all the time I was in the Navy. One would think that a flying instructor would have mentioned it with the idea of promoting safety or that it would have been a part of the "Theory of Flight" or in the lectures on aircraft construction and maintenance. Don't remember hearing the words until I was asked that question. So would I have been reprimanded for not knowing the answer? Maybe not. For anyone who doesn't know the meaning of the term and might be interested, it is this: An airplane is designed and constructed with a center of gravity point along the longitudinal axis of the fuselage of the airplane. This means that the weight forward of this point is exactly equal to the weight aft. It would balance perfectly on a fulcrum. The plane is constructed with the weight a little heavier on the forward half. The reason for this is so that in case of engine failure the nose will fall first there by gaining speed and increasing the wind over the control surfaces. If the after-section of the plane were heavier the tail would fall quickest and the pilot would not be able to gain control of the aircraft there by spinning to earth.

Continued.....
'This story was submitted to the People鈥檚 War site by 大象传媒 Radio Merseyside鈥檚 People鈥檚 War team on behalf of the author and has been added to the site with his / her permission. The author fully understands the site's terms and conditions.'

漏 Copyright of content contributed to this Archive rests with the author. Find out how you can use this.