Hi I'm Gillian St Lawrence, In July The Washington Post published my story "By freezing embryos, couples try to utilize fertility while delaying parenthood."
Spurned by the strong reactions I received from people, Alexandra Frean of the Times of London decided to interview me and just published "The girl who's put family plans in the deep freeze."
At age 30, despite nine happy years of marriage, my husband and I were not able to offer a child the time and financial resources we believed our child deserved. But, our fertility clocks were ticking. We knew that once we hit our mid-30's we would face significantly greater risks of infertility, miscarriage and genetic abnormality. With no solution to this dilemma we decided that we would not have children - until we found out about embryo freezing.
We did what I call Preservation IVF. We preserved our young genetic material by undergoing in vitro fertilization (specifically, a gentler version called natural or minimal stimulation ivf) to create five blastocyst embryos. The embryos were frozen using vitrification technology, which has a 98% successful thaw rate at the clinics we visited.
We plan to wait until about age 40 to transfer an embryo to my uterus in the hopes of having a healthy baby. We figure that with an extra 10 years we should be able to reach our goals and be in a position to offer our child the time and resources to give him or her the best life we can.
Preservation IVF touches on many sensitive topics - the ethics of IVF, the fear of having to undergo "Desperation IVF" due to age related infertility, whether there is a "right" time to become a parent, what makes a "good" parent, and whether "rich" people are trying to buy the perfect child. And I have definitely received some passionate responses to my article.
Many readers seemed to infer that our decision to use Preservation IVF to delay parenthood meant that we disapproved of other families' decisions to have children earlier in life.
For example, Rebecca Odes wrote on her blog:
"But if St. Lawrence is saying it's not okay to have kids if you can't spend as much time with them as you want, what does that say about 99.98% of parents in the world? Should we all have engineered our conceptions, and lives, differently? St. Lawrence's quest for optimal parenthood may be personal, but there's a broader implication."
I was also confronted by people who, for reasons they could sometimes not put their finger on, have a burning desire to see our plan fail. One woman wondered "are these people so arrogant or naive that they honestly believe that they, and they alone, can control so many factors in their lives that they will be able, at a time of their choosing, to produce a child exactly when the financial, personal and professional stars are in perfect alignment? The world simply doesn't work that way, folks."
The infertility blogosphere was appalled by my use of the phrase "Desperation IVF" to describe the emotionally fraught process undertaken by infertile couples, many of whom are being treated for age related infertility. Critics saw the term as an insensitive swipe at the women undergoing infertility treatment, rather than an explicit warning to younger women who could do something to avoid it.
Although many have pointed out to me that there is never a "perfect" time to have a child, there are definitely the wrong times to have a child. But Preservation IVF gave us the option to become parents and offer a child the best we can at the best time for us. Once I had completed the process, I felt the need to share my story with other couples who might also benefit from this option.
My husband Paul and I will be coming on the show on Friday to answer any questions you have about our decision, feel free to post and talk to you soon.
Tami emailed - I sure hope that you don't raise your child with all the planning you're doing now. That child will grow up neurotic.
Comment sent via Facebook
18:17
113631290
Ahmed Sherif - It is their embryos,they free to do what ever they want to do with it-this is 2010.
Comment sent via Facebook
18:11
113631290
Henry Tokula - WHY IS THIS AN ISSUE?!!ITS HER CHOICE AND HERS ALONE.hello world,people are still having the worst time of their lives in parts of pakistan and china from the rage of nature.
Comment sent via Facebook
18:11
113631290
Usual Suspect - If its a hundred percent safe then thats a great idea but hopfully they dont get divorced before having children
Comment sent via Facebook
18:10
113631290
Charles Wang - Personal decision, private business, existing technology, what's to discuss?
Comment sent via Facebook
18:10
113631290
Peter Obonyano - No. Women should not freeze up using inorganic medicine. We all should stay faithful by self control or marry our fellow willing partner for companionship. If all can abstain, fine, otherwise, lets get married.
Comment sent via Facebook
18:09
113631290
Amadu M. Bah This is absolutely non-scence, but i dont blame her because the so called paul is in support of her nasty idea. They will regret it one day.
Comment sent via BLOG
18:08
113631290
Ida on the blog - When it comes to childbirth, '40 is not the new 25'. As a prospective parent, you have assumed that in ten years, you will be gainfully employed and in excellent health to carry a child. That future is not promised.
Comment sent via Facebook
18:07
113631290
Zini Stanley - thats crazy and unnatural
Comment sent via YOURSAY
18:06
113631290
Colin Sundaram emails - Who said they can't? It is their inalienable right to freeze their eggs for future use. Let the men go to hell. The men have been domineering over the rights of the females until recently on each and everything.
Comment sent via BLOG
18:03
113631290
Alan in AZ on the blog - My wife an I had a good laugh when I told her about this story the other day. Not because of the delay, or money or any of the things you would think of. We thought about the difference now between how well we can chase after our grand kids compared to how easy it was chasing after our kids. And I'm only 51!
Comment sent via Facebook
18:00
113631290
Halkano Abdi - There is no appropriate time for having kids you have to decide whether you want them or not if you choose to have them then you deal with whatever comes along the way.
Comment sent via Facebook
17:58
113631290
Travis Dickson - Why should some one do such evil,people are looking for kids but u just freezing them.i gusse thats the new type of aborsion.
Comment sent via host
17:57
113631290
We''re live now. You can listen here:
Comment sent via host
17:51
113631290
Hello, Ben S here - today we''re asking: why shouldn''t women freeze their embryos?
Why shouldn't women freeze their embryos?
| Friday, 9 Sept. 2010 | 18:00 - 19:00 GMT
Hi I'm Gillian St Lawrence, In July The Washington Post published my story "By freezing embryos, couples try to utilize fertility while delaying parenthood."
Spurned by the strong reactions I received from people, Alexandra Frean of the Times of London decided to interview me and just published "The girl who's put family plans in the deep freeze."
At age 30, despite nine happy years of marriage, my husband and I were not able to offer a child the time and financial resources we believed our child deserved. But, our fertility clocks were ticking. We knew that once we hit our mid-30's we would face significantly greater risks of infertility, miscarriage and genetic abnormality. With no solution to this dilemma we decided that we would not have children - until we found out about embryo freezing.
We did what I call Preservation IVF. We preserved our young genetic material by undergoing in vitro fertilization (specifically, a gentler version called natural or minimal stimulation ivf) to create five blastocyst embryos. The embryos were frozen using vitrification technology, which has a 98% successful thaw rate at the clinics we visited.
We plan to wait until about age 40 to transfer an embryo to my uterus in the hopes of having a healthy baby. We figure that with an extra 10 years we should be able to reach our goals and be in a position to offer our child the time and resources to give him or her the best life we can.
Preservation IVF touches on many sensitive topics - the ethics of IVF, the fear of having to undergo "Desperation IVF" due to age related infertility, whether there is a "right" time to become a parent, what makes a "good" parent, and whether "rich" people are trying to buy the perfect child. And I have definitely received some passionate responses to my article.
Many readers seemed to infer that our decision to use Preservation IVF to delay parenthood meant that we disapproved of other families' decisions to have children earlier in life.
For example, Rebecca Odes wrote on her blog:
"But if St. Lawrence is saying it's not okay to have kids if you can't spend as much time with them as you want, what does that say about 99.98% of parents in the world? Should we all have engineered our conceptions, and lives, differently? St. Lawrence's quest for optimal parenthood may be personal, but there's a broader implication."
I was also confronted by people who, for reasons they could sometimes not put their finger on, have a burning desire to see our plan fail. One woman wondered "are these people so arrogant or naive that they honestly believe that they, and they alone, can control so many factors in their lives that they will be able, at a time of their choosing, to produce a child exactly when the financial, personal and professional stars are in perfect alignment? The world simply doesn't work that way, folks."
The infertility blogosphere was appalled by my use of the phrase "Desperation IVF" to describe the emotionally fraught process undertaken by infertile couples, many of whom are being treated for age related infertility. Critics saw the term as an insensitive swipe at the women undergoing infertility treatment, rather than an explicit warning to younger women who could do something to avoid it.
Although many have pointed out to me that there is never a "perfect" time to have a child, there are definitely the wrong times to have a child. But Preservation IVF gave us the option to become parents and offer a child the best we can at the best time for us. Once I had completed the process, I felt the need to share my story with other couples who might also benefit from this option.
My husband Paul and I will be coming on the show on Friday to answer any questions you have about our decision, feel free to post and talk to you soon.
Your comments
Comment sent via YOURSAY
Tami emailed - I sure hope that you don't raise your child with all the planning you're doing now. That child will grow up neurotic.
Comment sent via Facebook
Ahmed Sherif - It is their embryos,they free to do what ever they want to do with it-this is 2010.
Comment sent via Facebook
Henry Tokula - WHY IS THIS AN ISSUE?!!ITS HER CHOICE AND HERS ALONE.hello world,people are still having the worst time of their lives in parts of pakistan and china from the rage of nature.
Comment sent via Facebook
Usual Suspect - If its a hundred percent safe then thats a great idea but hopfully they dont get divorced before having children
Comment sent via Facebook
Charles Wang - Personal decision, private business, existing technology, what's to discuss?
Comment sent via Facebook
Peter Obonyano - No. Women should not freeze up using inorganic medicine. We all should stay faithful by self control or marry our fellow willing partner for companionship. If all can abstain, fine, otherwise, lets get married.
Comment sent via Facebook
Amadu M. Bah This is absolutely non-scence, but i dont blame her because the so called paul is in support of her nasty idea. They will regret it one day.
Comment sent via BLOG
Ida on the blog - When it comes to childbirth, '40 is not the new 25'. As a prospective parent, you have assumed that in ten years, you will be gainfully employed and in excellent health to carry a child. That future is not promised.
Comment sent via Facebook
Zini Stanley - thats crazy and unnatural
Comment sent via YOURSAY
Colin Sundaram emails - Who said they can't? It is their inalienable right to freeze their eggs for future use. Let the men go to hell. The men have been domineering over the rights of the females until recently on each and everything.
Comment sent via BLOG
Alan in AZ on the blog - My wife an I had a good laugh when I told her about this story the other day. Not because of the delay, or money or any of the things you would think of. We thought about the difference now between how well we can chase after our grand kids compared to how easy it was chasing after our kids. And I'm only 51!
Comment sent via Facebook
Halkano Abdi - There is no appropriate time for having kids you have to decide whether you want them or not if you choose to have them then you deal with whatever comes along the way.
Comment sent via Facebook
Travis Dickson - Why should some one do such evil,people are looking for kids but u just freezing them.i gusse thats the new type of aborsion.
Comment sent via host
We''re live now. You can listen here:
Comment sent via host
Hello, Ben S here - today we''re asking: why shouldn''t women freeze their embryos?