´óÏó´«Ã½

Maya relief of royal blood-letting

Contributed by British Museum

Click on the image to zoom in. Copyright Trustees of the British Museum

Image 1Ìý´Ç´ÚÌý4

This lintel from the doorway of a Maya temple depicts a royal blood-letting ceremony. King Shield Jaguar III stands facing his wife, Lady Xook, as she pulls a rope embedded with thorns through her tongue. She is undertaking this painful ordeal in order to contact Shield Jaguar's ancestors in the spirit realm. In Maya society, a ruler's power was based on the knowledge gained by communicating with the supernatural world through blood-letting rituals.

Who were the Maya?

The Maya ruled much of Mexico and Central America between AD 250 and 100. Around 60 separate Maya citystates developed - some were bitter enemies, others forged alliances. Bloodletting and human sacrifice was used to mark significant events in the lives of Maya rulers, such as the birth of an heir, accession to the throne and death. The Maya used different calendars to calculate the exact time for these ceremonies, including a sophisticated 52-year cycle, which was part of a larger calculation of time known as the Long Count.

The Maya calendar has a series of cycles of 52 years each. We are currently in the 13th, which ends 21 December 2012

Pain

If you can create a feeling of pain in the body – and you survive it – you can move into either a state of, not quite ecstasy, but out of the ordinariness, a sense that you, you can transcend, you can do something rather special, whether this comes from denial – not eating – or it comes from blood-letting, cutting, or it comes from extreme physical exercise.

We would call it ‘magical thinking’ in psychoanalytic terms – if I do this, I’m making a deal with myself that something will be ok.

What I find startling about this horrific image is how visible the woman’s pain is. I think in the present day we’ve come to hide our pain. We have the jokes about our capacity for pain but we don’t really show it.

If we examine the practices that we are involved in, they are often practices that if they were examined from outer space, they’d say ‘why would women be involved in these practices?’. . . It’s that women experience their sense of self by doing these things, by enacting them. They give them the sense of their own identity, and I’m sure that was true for her.

Susie Orbach, psychotherapist, psychoanalyst, writer

In search of Maya women

This lintel reveals the political intrigues of the Maya Court. In August, AD 709 one of Itzamnaaj Bahlam’s lesser wives, Lady Ik’Skull from neighboring city Calakmul, bore a son, Bird Jaguar IV. This son would later become heir to the Yaxchilan throne. Known as Lintel 24, this carving is inscribed with the date of October, AD 709, may have been a response to this event, advancing the claims to rulership of any male heir Lady Xook, the king’s primary wife, might produce.

The elaborately woven loincloth worn by the king and covered with a knotted k’an cross motif (symbolizing creation and regeneration), draws attention to the king’s biological powers of procreation, with the queen’s finger suggestively pointing towards the central ruffling and the remainder of the rope, soon to be ritually consummated with Lady Xook’s own blood, dangling nearby.

The ancient Maya landscape was dotted with cities competing for natural resources, political and economic power and the favour of the gods, creating an elaborate network of allies and enemies.

The trade and gift of textiles between Maya nobility of different regions cemented diplomatic relationships between competing city-states and helped maintain a distinct visual vocabulary of the noble class. Just as inter-marriage was a more peaceful alternative to a military campaign, so too was the system of tribute giving, which revolved around the production of textiles. Consequently, control over textile production was a major source of the nobility’s wealth and influence.

Elite women of the ancient Maya, like Lady Xook who is depicted in this lintel, would have been responsible for the manufacture of fine textiles. The basic equipment for weaving was the back-strap loom, which was attached to the weaver for easy portability. One end of the loom would have been attached to the woman’s hips, and the other end would have been tautly secured around a vertical post.

In both the modernday and the ancient Maya, it’s possible to draw a line between a woman’s role as weaver and her role as procreator. Both roles featured women as creators. In a near parallel to the birthing process, the arrangement of the back-strap loom resulted in the piece of cloth physically growing outward from the weaver’s body as it was woven.

A third role of women as creators is evident in the bloodletting ritual depicted in this lintel. While bloodletting was not the exclusive domain of women, the notion of drawing blood out of the body can be interpreted as mimicking the gods’ creation of the universe through their own blood. In fact, the needles used for bloodletting bore a stark similarity to those used for weaving, with the exception being that the needle used to puncture the skin was sharper than the one used for weaving.

Of course women not only wove the textiles that helped maintain political relationships, they married and bore political actors, too.

Christina Ripullone, Maya researcher

Comments are closed for this object

Comments

  • 4 comments
  • 1. At 12:22 on 14 June 2010, cgcgcg wrote:

    Surely the 52-year cycle was known as the Calendar Round, while the Long Count covered around 5,125 years?

  • 2. At 11:27 on 15 June 2010, Miles Hodgkiss wrote:

    I?m all for reason but this lintel appears to have been interpreted by the blind. A touch of the ?king has got no clothes on? is needed. The sculptor is excellent. A real master of his/her trade. I see no firey staff. I see no tongue, pierced or otherwise. I see no pain. I see no blood, not a drop.
    What I do see is a figure holding a frond. The botanical formation of the leaves opposing one another is acurately depicted and the leaves naturally become smaller towards the tip of the frond as anyone with knowledgable in plants will attest to.
    The rope certainly has attachments, but a carving cannot tell you whether they are of a sharp and lacerating material or softer material such as leather inpregnated with dope.
    It does not look like a tongue sticking out of the mouth to me but of an object being sucked in the mouth.
    Finally the expression on the face doesn?t look like pain to me but mind numbing, possibly intrancing.
    All in all given the date and the circumstances revealed by Christina Ripullone I?d interpret it as a carved lintel to celebrate an oracular ritual trance connected to the birth of a future king. A normal activity in the ancient world. Think Siwa, Delphi and possibly Mamalipuram amongst others.

  • 3. At 16:36 on 17 June 2010, David Prudames wrote:

    cgcgcg - thanks for clarifying. You are right that the Maya calendar included 52-year cycles, that were part of the Long Count - a larger calculation of time. The text above has been changed to make this clear.

    David Prudames, British Museum

  • 4. At 21:57 on 25 October 2010, Miles Hodgkiss wrote:

    Also, if I were creating a carving showing a tongue pierced clean through Id chisel a full frontal image to make the point absolutely clear. I rest my case.

Share this link:

Most of the content on A History of the World is created by the contributors, who are the museums and members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the ´óÏó´«Ã½ or the British Museum. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site’s House Rules please Flag This Object.

A History of the World in 100 objects

Read the transcript

Part of

About this object

Click a button to explore other objects in the timeline

Location

Mexico

Culture
Period

AD 600-900

Theme
Size
H:
109cm
W:
78cm
D:
6cm
Colour
Material

View more objects from people in London.

Find out more

Podcast

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.