大象传媒

Analysing Non-Fiction - Sample answer - version two

Question

Refer to both Extract 1 and Extract 2.

Compare how the two writers convey different attitudes towards helping homeless people.

In your answer, you should:

  • compare their attitudes
  • compare the methods they use to convey their attitudes
  • support your ideas with quotations from both texts

Ireland and Dickens have very different attitudes towards helping homeless people.

One difference is that Ireland seems much more positive about it than Dickens. When describing the volunteers, Ireland uses adjectives like 鈥渞eady鈥 and 鈥渂rave鈥 whereas Dickens uses 鈥渦gly object鈥 to describe the homeless man. These words suggest that Ireland thinks people are keen to help the homeless whereas Dickens finds the homeless man unpleasant.

Ireland presents attitudes towards helping homeless people with an enthusiastic tone, quotations from those involved state that the night is 鈥済reat fun鈥 and 鈥渁 real community effort鈥. The adjectives 鈥済reat鈥 and 鈥渞eal鈥 emphasise the enthusiasm and effort that goes into the fund raising event. On the other hand, Dickens is more formal and serious 鈥渙ne of the worst night sights I know鈥. This makes the reader imagine a terrible situation where nothing is done to help.

In Extract 1, Ireland quotes Chris Kershaw鈥檚 metaphor that the charity 鈥渨as close to his heart鈥. The connotations of heart imply that helping is deeply personal and emotional to those involved. However, Dickens does not seem to be as closely involved when he offers money to the homeless man. The simile 鈥渓ike a worried dog鈥 suggests that Dickens views the man like a frightened animal and helps out of pity.

Extract 1 ends with positive statistics, 鈥淟ast year鈥檚 event brought in more than 拢30,000鈥. The reader will feel pleased about how much this will help the charity and homeless people. However, Dickens ends with a negative tone saying that 鈥渢he growth in corruption鈥 is 鈥渄isplayed in these all uncared for savages鈥. The reader will feel sadness at the neglect of these children.

Feedback - improving

This answer:

  • Has an introduction which gives an overview of the answer, and a conclusion, even if it is very short.
  • Uses quotations and examples to back up points. Some of the points are developed with further discussion 鈥 like how word choices suggest the attitudes of both writers.
  • Selects words and explores their .
  • Identifies methods, eg , and .
  • Comments on how parts of each text might affect the reader.
  • Compares how each text ends and what the reader feels.

However, it would have been better if:

  • They had developed their introduction, summarising the attitudes over the entire extracts 鈥 acknowledging that both authors want homeless people to receive help.
  • They had commented on the different forms used, as well as their purpose and intended audiences, eg Ireland鈥檚 feature article aims to inform readers about the 鈥楩ramework鈥 charity and persuade them to think about helping. Readers might even decide to sign up for the next 鈥楤ig Sleep Out鈥. It is also written in a way that entertains readers with , making a serious topic more accessible and personal. Dickens鈥 essay also aims to inform readers about the need to help homeless people. His tone is more formal and he argues his opinion that the 鈥榞rowth of corruption鈥 in society is partly to blame for the lack of help that the homeless receive.
  • They had explored the wider meanings created by the word choices quoted, eg 鈥渟avages鈥 implies that the homeless children have become wild and unruly.
  • They had linked points to further evidence, eg at the end of the article, Ireland informs readers when the next charity night is and where they can sign up. This directs readers to get involved personally in helping homeless people.
  • Ireland鈥檚 article is upbeat and celebrates one charity鈥檚 success in 鈥減reventing homelessness and helping people into accommodation鈥. Whereas Dickens employs a more accusatory tone. He states that 鈥渢he growth of corruption鈥 has led to a terrible situation where homeless people do not receive the help they need.