Round up: Saturday 19th December 2009
There was a lot going on last week so here's an extra helping of interesting links you may have missed:
On the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Research and Development blog Alia Sheikh introduces us to "Collaberative Archive Navigation".
The Audience Experience research section has been thinking about different types and sources of metadata and why some might be more useful than others.......Metadata can tell you what your content is. Metadata can tell you what the ingredients of your content are. If we drill down to a single unit of content - let's say a song - it can tell you what that is made of too. All of this seems irrelevant until you consider the problems that it can solve- the thousands of hours of digital content, and the person searching for that specific clip.
Earlier in the week Douglas Carswell MP was critical of the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s Digital Revolution project :
Surely, that's a bit like asking the Vatican to provide the commentary on the Reformation?
Jason Da Ponte of the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s mobile team shares his recent presentation at XLab in Sydney on his personal blog:
James Cridland ex ´óÏó´«Ã½ has . James has kindly set up an if you still need the list. Thanks for the list in the first place James, and my best wishes.
And finally Head of ´óÏó´«Ã½ HD Danielle Nagler was interviewed on Radio 4's You and Yours last week (still available on ´óÏó´«Ã½ iPlayer).
Nick Reynolds is Social Media Executive, ´óÏó´«Ã½ Online
Comment number 1.
At 20th Dec 2009, voice_germany wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 6th Jan 2010, John wrote:Can someone tell me where the posts are going on the PQ blog. There appear to be 592 as of now, but the last one showing is #500.
Thanks.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 6th Jan 2010, Stuart_Wilson wrote:At the end of the last post on page 1 (#500), there is a "Next" button. Press this to go forward........
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 7th Jan 2010, John wrote:Thanks very much Stuart. I hadn't spotted that.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 27th Mar 2010, U14390976 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 20th May 2010, Manu wrote:Thanks for this quick explanation
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)