Privacy Commission Day 4, Witness 3: Max Clifford
PR consultant Max Clifford gives evidence to PM's Privacy Commission.
Post categories: PM Privacy Commission
George South | 17:00 UK time, Wednesday, 22 June 2011
PR consultant Max Clifford gives evidence to PM's Privacy Commission.
Jump to more content from this blog
PM The evening news and current affairs programme presented by Eddie Mair.
iPM The programme that starts with its listeners. Join the discussions online and contribute ideas for a weekly programme presented by Eddie Mair and Jennifer Tracey.
Read the final report of the PM Privacy Commission.
Meet the commissioners, view the terms of reference and hear the Commission Chair Sir Michael Lyons explain his approach.
´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 23rd Jun 2011, jonnie wrote:Initially I thought this Privacy Commission would be dull - however I have totally revised my opinion. The witnesses have all been fascinating to listen to.
I noticed Lord Faulks took umbrage to Max's comments about judges. Possibly justly so.
Great to listen to the whole un-edited recording and the refreshments comments.
One point Max raised was that 40 years ago his job was all about promotion, though since the late eighties this has evolved into one of protection. What has brought on such a change? Would this just be the press trying to survive in a more competitive era and trying to increase circulation figures..
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 25th Jun 2011, gagged1980 wrote:If one is in receipt of a gagging order, would a facebook account count as automatic contempt of court?
It follows that the untold, undisclosed recipients are being denied the right of expression.
Numerically may the taxpayers know how many are denied disclosure about their own busieness?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)