Does the Nobel Prize overshadow its winner?
It's a mixed blessing, winning the Nobel Prize for Literature.
This year, the prize went to the French novelist, . Along with the international cachet and recognition, there is also a diploma, a medal and 10m kronor (£831,259) in prize money.
Monsieur Le Clezio received his award today from King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. He has had to endure his accolade being somewhat overshadowed by the comments made by , the Swedish Academy's permanent secretary. The insult he unleashed was pretty spectacular. He said that American culture remains "" and "insular" to produce a new writer of Nobel rank.
I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in Philip Roth's house when he heard that. Roth has been touted as a possible winner for many years - well, by journalists anyway.
And then there were the jokes pitting Scandinavian culture against American culture. You know the kind of thing: How could a culture which had produced the likes of Kierkegaard, Ibsen and Stringberg launch insults about scope to a country which has produced Henry James, Saul Bellow, Toni Morrison and Jhumpa Lahiri (to name a few off the top of my head). And now, this "insular" culture has produced a major critical work on Scandinavian Literature: Arnold Weinstein's just published . It must be tempting for the publishers (Princeton University Press) to send a copy to Horace Engdahl!
Anyway, here's to Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clezio. Remember him?
Comment number 1.
At 23rd Dec 2008, dennisjunior1 wrote:Hi Razia:
I think the Nobel Prize overshadows the winner...yes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 18th Jan 2009, tediouslybrief wrote:the nobel prize for literature is worth having - because it is a lot of money.
other than that, membership of a club which includes pearl s. buck, anatole france, henryk sienkiewicz (quo vadis), and elfriede jelinek - but not ezra pound, james joyce, yasunari kawabata, graham greene, saunders lewis - is no special accolade.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)