´óÏó´«Ã½

I haven't seen Slumdog Millionaire yet but if it's a patch on some of Boyle's other movies then it should hit Oscar pay-dirt - and it's about time.

There are few directors on the go today who can switch genre so effortlessly as Boyle can and yet still hit the dizzy heights of classic moviedom.

I watched 28 Days Later in a very quiet cinema theatre (there were two of us in the entire auditorium) and I have never been more creeped out in my life.

Sunshine was another brilliant film (with a stunning score to boot), and one of my favourite films of last year; and then, of course, who can forget the seminal Trainspotting.

As genre-hopping directors go, Boyle is probably the only one on the go today who even comes close to matching the magnificent Rob Reiner at his height.

I'm a huge Danny Boyle fan and saw Slumdog Millionaire a few weeks ago. It was hands down one of the best films I've seen in a really long time. Considering so much of the crap that Hollywood puts out, it's refreshing to see that great films are being made. It's tragic though that so many aren't able to find distribution - like this one almost did. If Slumdog isn't nominated for some kind of aware then I will have really lost faith in those who vote.

I watched Slumdog Millionaire a few weeks. I ve always been uncomfortable seeing a westerner trying to make an asian movie for it lacks the touch of reality. Rave reviews of SD made me believe that this movie is different and worth watching. Though I thoroughly enjoyed the first part (the first chasing scene was abosolutely fantastic), the film couldn't hold on to its potential till the end. It came out be more of a "masala" movie. The story lacked the punch and the grown up actors looked unoriginal. May be this film ll be appreciated by people outside of indian subcontinent but for a native speaker it ll be another bollywood film with english speaking actors.

Overall movies from the Bollywood industry I tend to avoid. The fantasy,sensationalism,all-in-one genre emotions and musicals really get on my nerves and get cheesy. Only a few movies are memorable (usually what they call 'Art' movies there) and don't follow the same boy meets girl love story schema or movie scripts borrowed from Hollywood.

Unfortunately I seem to end up in heated arguments with fans who can't take my dislike of the industry and preference for Hollywood!

But yes there are some GREAT movies. The gangster movies were a nice change in the mid-90's, and it started with 'Satya' (whose director and writer, Ram Gopal Varma, I absolutely respect, and unearthed acting jems like Manoj Bajpai) but since then its been stereotypical.

I guess it has to do with audience demand...the people don't want to see something realistic to their lives...they want escapism from the stresses of their lives (though a trend towards darker movies like terrorism are making it to the front). That's why when Bollywood admirers ask me who my favourite actor is (I have many but I usually tell them Nana Patekar), they have a puzzled look, and tell me they meant best big,spectacular or good looking actor.

I'm in the UK and was really excited to see that the book Q and A by Vikas Swarup has been made into this film because the book was excellent. Looking forward to seeing it in January.

I saw SD twice in last 3 weeks. On both occaisions I sat 2 rows from the screen (very difficult position to watch a movie in a theatre) and audience clapped at the end of the movie. I liked the movie very much, thats why I went in second time. Oscar recognition looks doubtful, maybe it has a chance in "Adapted Screenplay" and "Direction" categories.